Skip to main content
added 245 characters in body
Source Link
emnha
  • 1.7k
  • 5
  • 40
  • 94

On the forum, post #12, Ghar claimed that the proof gain-bandwidth product from wikipedia is awful and he gave another proof but with feedback.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain%E2%80%93bandwidth_product
  2. http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/op-amps-and-gain-bandwidth-product.43799/

The wikipedia proves gain-bandwidth product constant for open-loop opamp while Ghar proved for closed loop opamp.

Could you please tell me that if the wikipedia proof is wrong? I don't see any thing wrong with it. However, reading Ghar's post makes me confused.

I attach the Ghar's post in the image below just in case some member can't access it.

Note: Let's consider single pole opamp only. This site also gave the same proof as wikipedia.

http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/why-is-the-op-amp-gain-bandwidth-product-constant/

enter image description here

On the forum, post #12, Ghar claimed that the proof gain-bandwidth product from wikipedia is awful and he gave another proof but with feedback.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain%E2%80%93bandwidth_product
  2. http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/op-amps-and-gain-bandwidth-product.43799/

The wikipedia proves gain-bandwidth product constant for open-loop opamp while Ghar proved for closed loop opamp.

Could you please tell me that if the wikipedia proof is wrong? I don't see any thing wrong with it. However, reading Ghar's post makes me confused.

I attach the Ghar's post in the image below just in case some member can't access it.

Note: Let's consider single pole opamp only.

enter image description here

On the forum, post #12, Ghar claimed that the proof gain-bandwidth product from wikipedia is awful and he gave another proof but with feedback.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain%E2%80%93bandwidth_product
  2. http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/op-amps-and-gain-bandwidth-product.43799/

The wikipedia proves gain-bandwidth product constant for open-loop opamp while Ghar proved for closed loop opamp.

Could you please tell me that if the wikipedia proof is wrong? I don't see any thing wrong with it. However, reading Ghar's post makes me confused.

I attach the Ghar's post in the image below just in case some member can't access it.

Note: Let's consider single pole opamp only. This site also gave the same proof as wikipedia.

http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/why-is-the-op-amp-gain-bandwidth-product-constant/

enter image description here

added 97 characters in body
Source Link
emnha
  • 1.7k
  • 5
  • 40
  • 94

On the forumforum, post #12, Ghar claimed that the proof gain-bandwidth product from wikipedia is awful and he gave another proof but with feedback.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain%E2%80%93bandwidth_product
  2. http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/op-amps-and-gain-bandwidth-product.43799/

The wikipedia proves gain-bandwidth product constant for open-loop opamp while Ghar proved for closed loop opamp.

Could you please tell me that if the wikipedia proof is wrong? I don't see any thing wrong with it. However, reading Ghar's post makes me confused.

I attach the Ghar's post in the image below just in case some member can't access it.

Note: Let's consider single pole opamp only.

enter image description here

On the forum, post #12, Ghar claimed that the proof gain-bandwidth product from wikipedia is awful and he gave another proof but with feedback.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain%E2%80%93bandwidth_product
  2. http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/op-amps-and-gain-bandwidth-product.43799/

The wikipedia proves gain-bandwidth product constant for open-loop opamp while Ghar proved for closed loop opamp.

Could you please tell me that if the wikipedia proof is wrong? I don't see any thing wrong with it. However, reading Ghar's post makes me confused.

I attach the Ghar's post in the image below just in case some member can't access it.

Note: Let's consider single pole opamp only.

enter image description here

On the forum, post #12, Ghar claimed that the proof gain-bandwidth product from wikipedia is awful and he gave another proof but with feedback.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain%E2%80%93bandwidth_product
  2. http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/op-amps-and-gain-bandwidth-product.43799/

The wikipedia proves gain-bandwidth product constant for open-loop opamp while Ghar proved for closed loop opamp.

Could you please tell me that if the wikipedia proof is wrong? I don't see any thing wrong with it. However, reading Ghar's post makes me confused.

I attach the Ghar's post in the image below just in case some member can't access it.

Note: Let's consider single pole opamp only.

enter image description here

Source Link
emnha
  • 1.7k
  • 5
  • 40
  • 94

Gain-bandwidth product proof for open loop/closed loop opamp

On the forum, post #12, Ghar claimed that the proof gain-bandwidth product from wikipedia is awful and he gave another proof but with feedback.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain%E2%80%93bandwidth_product
  2. http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/op-amps-and-gain-bandwidth-product.43799/

The wikipedia proves gain-bandwidth product constant for open-loop opamp while Ghar proved for closed loop opamp.

Could you please tell me that if the wikipedia proof is wrong? I don't see any thing wrong with it. However, reading Ghar's post makes me confused.

I attach the Ghar's post in the image below just in case some member can't access it.

Note: Let's consider single pole opamp only.

enter image description here