Skip to main content
added 224 characters in body
Source Link
endolith
  • 29k
  • 24
  • 121
  • 184

For calculating the equivalent noise bandwidth of a non-brickwall filter, I can find two different sets of numbers, both of which claim they are similar things:


Order   EqNBW
1   1.5708
2   1.1107
3   1.0472
4   1.0262
5   1.0166
6   1.0115
7   1.0084
8   1.0065
9   1.0051
10  1.0041

 


1 1.57
2 1.22
3 1.16
4 1.13
5 1.12

Which is correct?

Or are they both correct; just used in different calculations?

Update

After figuring this out, I made a chart of the different factors and the types of filters they work for: ENBW Filter correction factors vs order

For calculating the equivalent noise bandwidth of a non-brickwall filter, I can find two different sets of numbers, both of which claim they are similar things:


Order   EqNBW
1   1.5708
2   1.1107
3   1.0472
4   1.0262
5   1.0166
6   1.0115
7   1.0084
8   1.0065
9   1.0051
10  1.0041

 


1 1.57
2 1.22
3 1.16
4 1.13
5 1.12

Which is correct?

Or are they both correct; just used in different calculations?

For calculating the equivalent noise bandwidth of a non-brickwall filter, I can find two different sets of numbers, both of which claim they are similar things:


Order   EqNBW
1   1.5708
2   1.1107
3   1.0472
4   1.0262
5   1.0166
6   1.0115
7   1.0084
8   1.0065
9   1.0051
10  1.0041

 


1 1.57
2 1.22
3 1.16
4 1.13
5 1.12

Which is correct?

Or are they both correct; just used in different calculations?

Update

After figuring this out, I made a chart of the different factors and the types of filters they work for: ENBW Filter correction factors vs order

Tweeted twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/822123105120350211
added 17 characters in body
Source Link
endolith
  • 29k
  • 24
  • 121
  • 184

For calculating the equivalent noise bandwidth of a non-brickwall filter, I can find two different sets of numbers, both of which claim they are similar things:

 
Order   EqNBW
1   1.5708
2   1.1107
3   1.0472
4   1.0262
5   1.0166
6   1.0115
7   1.0084
8   1.0065
9   1.0051
10  1.0041
 

 


1 1.57
2 1.22
3 1.16
4 1.13
5 1.12

Which is correct?

Or are they both correct; just used in different calculations?

For calculating the equivalent noise bandwidth of a non-brickwall filter, I can find two different sets of numbers, both of which claim they are similar things:

Order   EqNBW
1   1.5708
2   1.1107
3   1.0472
4   1.0262
5   1.0166
6   1.0115
7   1.0084
8   1.0065
9   1.0051
10  1.0041

1 1.57
2 1.22
3 1.16
4 1.13
5 1.12

Which is correct?

Or are they both correct; just used in different calculations?

For calculating the equivalent noise bandwidth of a non-brickwall filter, I can find two different sets of numbers, both of which claim they are similar things:

 
Order   EqNBW
1   1.5708
2   1.1107
3   1.0472
4   1.0262
5   1.0166
6   1.0115
7   1.0084
8   1.0065
9   1.0051
10  1.0041
 

 


1 1.57
2 1.22
3 1.16
4 1.13
5 1.12

Which is correct?

Or are they both correct; just used in different calculations?

Source Link
endolith
  • 29k
  • 24
  • 121
  • 184

Why are there two sets of ENBW correction factors?

For calculating the equivalent noise bandwidth of a non-brickwall filter, I can find two different sets of numbers, both of which claim they are similar things:

Order   EqNBW
1   1.5708
2   1.1107
3   1.0472
4   1.0262
5   1.0166
6   1.0115
7   1.0084
8   1.0065
9   1.0051
10  1.0041

1 1.57
2 1.22
3 1.16
4 1.13
5 1.12

Which is correct?

Or are they both correct; just used in different calculations?