Timeline for Prototyping with ATMEGA328P-PU (DIP-28) for ATMEGA328P-AU (TQFP-32)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2017 at 3:41 | vote | accept | George Y. | ||
| Feb 1, 2017 at 3:31 | answer | added | gilhad | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 1, 2017 at 2:57 | comment | added | George Y. | Because I prototype on a breadboard. I can solder TQFP on a DIP adapter, but it will have pins on each side, which will not work with a breadboard as all horizontal pins would be shortened. | |
| Feb 1, 2017 at 2:00 | comment | added | Ale..chenski | Why do you believe that prototyping in TQFP is less convenient than in DIP-28? You will eventually need to make it in TQFP footprint, with proper pin placement. If your goal is to provide early platform for software development, it is better to do this in configuration as close as the final product as possible. All you need is to place few debug headers around the TQFP. | |
| Feb 1, 2017 at 1:25 | comment | added | auoa | Ok so the ATMEGA328P-AU behaves exact the some way the ATMEGA328P-PU does, because it's the same controller, just another package. The only thing that should be taken into consideration is, if all pins you need are connected in the DIP package. | |
| Feb 1, 2017 at 1:24 | comment | added | George Y. | I've never done this before this way, so just asking. So something like "it will work [and I have done that]" or "it will not work because..." would be perfect answers/ | |
| Feb 1, 2017 at 1:22 | comment | added | auoa | Why should it not work? What kind of issue do you expect? | |
| Feb 1, 2017 at 1:16 | history | asked | George Y. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |