Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Apr 30, 2017 at 16:55 history suggested try-catch-finally CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarified title (added textual description of the schematic); mathjaxed smybols and values; fixed typos; added [current-source]
Apr 30, 2017 at 16:29 review Suggested edits
S Apr 30, 2017 at 16:55
Apr 30, 2017 at 12:49 vote accept elecV1
Apr 30, 2017 at 12:09 comment added elecV1 Thanks again G36.You are right for VE1=0.7V I was confused.For your second thought I believe it's a good explanation but maybe there are another solution without assumptions.
Apr 30, 2017 at 11:58 comment added G36 The Q3 emitter voltage is: Ve = Vb3 - Vbe3 = Vbe1+Vbe2 -Vbe3 = 0.7V + 0.7V - 0.7V = 0.7V. As for why Ie2 = Ib3 + 50Ib3 the Ie2 current should be much larger then Ib3 so I assumed 50 times larger.
Apr 30, 2017 at 11:50 comment added elecV1 G36 thank you for your answer.Indeed BJT's are identical.However, your equation R4 = 0.7V/404uA I think it's wrong because emmiter voltage of Q3 it isn't O.7V but 1.4V.Also I don't understand why Ie2 =50Ib3 as you mentioned above.Thank you
Apr 30, 2017 at 11:33 comment added G36 Ie3 = Ic3+Ib3 = (beta +1)/beta * Ic3 = 404uA so R4 = 0.7V/404uA = 17.326kΩ. IR5 = Ib3 + (Ic2+Ib2) = Ib3 + Ie2 = Ib3 + 50Ib3 = 204uA--->R5 = (8V - 1.4V)/204uA = 32.352kΩ
Apr 30, 2017 at 11:19 answer added Neil_UK timeline score: 1
Apr 30, 2017 at 11:07 comment added G36 No Shockley equation ? And the BJT's are identical ?
Apr 30, 2017 at 10:28 history asked elecV1 CC BY-SA 3.0