Timeline for Why do buck (step-down) switching regulators require an inductor and diode?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 14, 2015 at 12:53 | history | edited | Stephen Collings |
Retagged
|
|
May 12, 2012 at 2:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackElectronix/status/201133385714905089 | ||
May 12, 2012 at 0:16 | history | edited | Telaclavo |
edited tags
|
|
May 11, 2012 at 23:41 | vote | accept | Nick Johnson | ||
May 11, 2012 at 17:58 | answer | added | D.A.S. | timeline score: 3 | |
May 11, 2012 at 17:13 | answer | added | supercat | timeline score: 3 | |
May 11, 2012 at 16:05 | answer | added | Russell McMahon♦ | timeline score: 8 | |
May 11, 2012 at 14:40 | answer | added | Stephen Collings | timeline score: 13 | |
May 11, 2012 at 14:37 | comment | added | Nick Johnson | @Telaclavo The latter. | |
May 11, 2012 at 14:34 | answer | added | stevenvh | timeline score: 3 | |
May 11, 2012 at 14:26 | answer | added | Telaclavo | timeline score: 22 | |
May 11, 2012 at 14:15 | comment | added | Telaclavo | "why buck converters in particular aren't simpler" You mean why buck converters aren't simpler than boost converters (which is not true), or why buck converters aren't simpler than they are? | |
May 11, 2012 at 14:09 | history | asked | Nick Johnson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |