Timeline for hamming burst error detection [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2018 at 1:57 | history | closed |
Marcus Müller brhans Bence Kaulics Neil_UK user105652 |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 13:50 | comment | added | Peter Smith | Burst errors can be solved by implementing the Chinese Remainder Theorem (at one point TI - I think - actually implemented an IC for this). | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 10:04 | comment | added | Harry Svensson | @joey, hmmm.. I can solve it for 1 bit error... but if it's 2 or more then I'm not good enough. - I will put a 500 point bounty on this question so someone else more knowledgeable can pitch in. I can't initiate a bounty yet, 2 days since the question was asked has to passed. | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 10:01 | history | edited | Harry Svensson |
Added this tag so whatever code that comes next will be formatted correctly.
|
|
| Jan 5, 2018 at 8:55 | answer | added | Harry Svensson | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 22:31 | comment | added | JoeyB | @HarrySvensson - I am finding it hard to understand this "As you can see, if there is only 1 error, then you get a number above 7, if there's 2 errors then it's below 8. If there's 3 errors it's above 7 again.". I know to you it might be easy to pick it up but I am really getting confused. After you multiply it (received message) with the Parity Matrix you get the 4 bits and then you convert those 4 bits to a decimal number, after this im lost on what you said that I have quoted | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 21:55 | comment | added | Harry Svensson | @Joey I write "LUT" several times. - If you want to solve it in a more memory efficient way, then use an FPGA/CPLD and compare which distance that is the shortest. You can easily pipeline that. - Check out this link that I made a while back, put a 1 in the c×G box (this means you are making an error). As you can see, if there is only 1 error, then you get a number above 7, if there's 2 errors then it's below 8. If there's 3 errors it's above 7 again. - This means that you can correct error. | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 21:44 | comment | added | JoeyB | @HarrySvensson - I have read your answer but you dont show how to correct the error, could you help with that? | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 20:49 | comment | added | Harry Svensson | @Joey This question and its answer might help you get everything set. | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 20:33 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 6, 2018 at 1:57 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2018 at 20:29 | history | edited | JoeyB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 186 characters in body
|
| Jan 4, 2018 at 20:25 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | not 100% sure what you're looking for, but maybe p.20f of inference.org.uk/mackay/itila/book.html is helpful? | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 20:16 | comment | added | JoeyB | @Marcus Müller - can you suggest any books that I can download | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 20:13 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions for code written to a specification are off-topic in the same sense that product recommendation questions are. OP isn't asking for a reference – OP's asking for code. | |
| Jan 4, 2018 at 20:07 | history | asked | JoeyB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |