Timeline for What is the difference between RS-232 and RS-232-C?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2022 at 20:11 | vote | accept | shafeeq | ||
| Jan 30, 2019 at 0:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/1090399396624322561 | ||
| Jan 29, 2019 at 14:59 | comment | added | Lundin | Briefly: RS stands for "recommended standard". It was an early draft that became industry de facto standard before formal standardization. The formal standard that later became mainstream was EIA 232 C, where EIA is the standard institute and C is revision. This one is sloppily referred to as RS-232-C, since RS-232 is such a well-known name. But strictly speaking, it is slang and not the correct term to use. | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 14:51 | history | edited | SamGibson♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed typo in title. While I'm here, also standardised on the correct placement of the "dashes" to match the actual standard. It's RS (dash) 232 (dash) C.
|
| S Jan 29, 2019 at 12:00 | history | suggested | Electric_90 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor fixes
|
| Jan 29, 2019 at 11:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 29, 2019 at 12:00 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2019 at 11:08 | history | edited | winny | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jan 29, 2019 at 11:06 | answer | added | Vitalii | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jun 28, 2018 at 13:41 | answer | added | Elliot Alderson | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jun 28, 2018 at 13:29 | history | asked | shafeeq | CC BY-SA 4.0 |