Timeline for Does SNR improve at higher sampling rates for a low pass filtered signal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2019 at 18:27 | vote | accept | floppy380 | ||
| Mar 22, 2019 at 3:08 | answer | added | Edgar Brown | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 21, 2019 at 22:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 16, 2018 at 12:51 | answer | added | Cristobol Polychronopolis | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 16, 2018 at 0:23 | answer | added | analogsystemsrf | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 15, 2018 at 17:24 | answer | added | Syed Mohammad Asjad | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 15, 2018 at 14:40 | comment | added | Andy aka | Yes, there's a trade off and the price is how good you make your anti-alias filter. | |
| Jul 15, 2018 at 13:45 | comment | added | floppy380 | I see, so if we sample at 100Hz we get more aliased high freq. band than if we did sample at 1kHz. So the best way is to sample at very high freq. but it means too much storage. There must be a trade off. | |
| Jul 15, 2018 at 10:27 | comment | added | Andy aka | A higher sampling rate means less noise from higher frequencies is aliased into the baseband after digitization. | |
| Jul 15, 2018 at 3:24 | history | asked | floppy380 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |