Timeline for How do I write KVL in this circuit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 15:10 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 6, 2012 at 21:34 | vote | accept | Siraj Muhammad | ||
| Sep 5, 2012 at 11:33 | comment | added | Dave Tweed | It works just as well with DC sources, too. You consider the effects of each source one at a time, replacing each other voltage source with a short circuit, and each other current source (there are none in this particular circuit) with an open circuit. I think if you do this, you'll see that the problem is greatly simplified and you'll gain some important insights. | |
| Sep 5, 2012 at 8:48 | history | edited | Siraj Muhammad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Sep 5, 2012 at 8:41 | comment | added | Siraj Muhammad | @DaveTweed, Yes I have studied this principle with waves and Alternative Current power sources... How do I match this principle with this condition? | |
| Sep 4, 2012 at 21:05 | comment | added | Dave Tweed | Have you been taught about the superposition principle yet? This is the basis of how you deal with a circuit that has multiple independent sources. | |
| Sep 4, 2012 at 19:28 | comment | added | Alfred Centauri | @BrianCarlton, I don't think this is a duplicate. KCL is used in node analysis, not KVL. | |
| Sep 4, 2012 at 19:14 | answer | added | Alfred Centauri | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 4, 2012 at 18:49 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 9, 2012 at 3:04 | |||||
| Sep 4, 2012 at 18:47 | comment | added | Brian Carlton | possible duplicate of Solving this circuit using node analysis | |
| Sep 4, 2012 at 18:36 | history | asked | Siraj Muhammad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |