Timeline for New C++ (C++11) and embedded electronics
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2, 2013 at 1:36 | comment | added | Connor Wolf | The best C++(whatever) to use for microcontrollers is still C. | |
Jul 1, 2013 at 22:10 | comment | added | David Norman | I for one like to program micros in traditional C language | |
S Jul 1, 2013 at 20:37 | history | suggested | abey |
added c++11 tag
|
|
Jul 1, 2013 at 20:10 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 1, 2013 at 20:37 | |||||
Sep 10, 2012 at 19:58 | comment | added | Siraj Muhammad | @AngryEE LOL I don't mean that C++ is old, even though, if it is I think it's the BEST. But I mean the features before C++11. | |
Sep 10, 2012 at 16:23 | comment | added | AngryEE | Old-Stlye C++? C++ is old now? I feel very old then, only working with C! | |
Sep 10, 2012 at 9:52 | comment | added | Rocketmagnet | @IgnacioVazquez-Abrams - That is utterly irrelevant. | |
Sep 9, 2012 at 18:30 | comment | added | user8459 | R-values in C++11 is a total BS. C guys were doing that even before C++ existence. | |
Sep 9, 2012 at 17:53 | comment | added | m.Alin | I liked it more when it was C++0x.. | |
Sep 9, 2012 at 17:48 | answer | added | Wouter van Ooijen | timeline score: 1 | |
Sep 9, 2012 at 15:29 | comment | added | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams | Meh. It all boils down to assembly code in the end. | |
Sep 9, 2012 at 15:12 | history | asked | Siraj Muhammad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |