Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Glenn W9IQ
  • 5.6k
  • 12
  • 17

Thanks for the good interaction via comments to your question in order to better understand the working conditions and desired behavior of your proposed control circuit.

Here is a simple implementation of ESCin=5 volts * %V{limit} * %R1 as we discussed via comments:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

One very important detail is that whatever I add should not be able to generate a phantom signal, i.e. Vout MUST be always less or equal to Vin, even in the event of software bugs and reasonable hardware failures.

It certainly meets this requirement. The only failure mode is if Vlimit has the possibility of exceeding 5 volts.

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. But since the operator's feedback is sensory, this may have minimal impact, particularly if you can ramp in your Vlimit control voltage via your ADCDAC.

Another version of this would be to take the wiper output of the pot, resistively scale it if necessary, and then use that as the Vref for the ADCDAC. You can also add common mode decoupled buffers as necessary to ensure low noise inputs throughout.

Thanks for the good interaction via comments to your question in order to better understand the working conditions and desired behavior of your proposed control circuit.

Here is a simple implementation of ESCin=5 volts * %V{limit} * %R1 as we discussed via comments:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

One very important detail is that whatever I add should not be able to generate a phantom signal, i.e. Vout MUST be always less or equal to Vin, even in the event of software bugs and reasonable hardware failures.

It certainly meets this requirement. The only failure mode is if Vlimit has the possibility of exceeding 5 volts.

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. But since the operator's feedback is sensory, this may have minimal impact, particularly if you can ramp in your Vlimit control voltage via your ADC.

Another version of this would be to take the wiper output of the pot, resistively scale it if necessary, and then use that as the Vref for the ADC. You can also add common mode decoupled buffers as necessary to ensure low noise inputs throughout.

Thanks for the good interaction via comments to your question in order to better understand the working conditions and desired behavior of your proposed control circuit.

Here is a simple implementation of ESCin=5 volts * %V{limit} * %R1 as we discussed via comments:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

One very important detail is that whatever I add should not be able to generate a phantom signal, i.e. Vout MUST be always less or equal to Vin, even in the event of software bugs and reasonable hardware failures.

It certainly meets this requirement. The only failure mode is if Vlimit has the possibility of exceeding 5 volts.

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. But since the operator's feedback is sensory, this may have minimal impact, particularly if you can ramp in your Vlimit control voltage via your DAC.

Another version of this would be to take the wiper output of the pot, resistively scale it if necessary, and then use that as the Vref for the DAC. You can also add common mode decoupled buffers as necessary to ensure low noise inputs throughout.

Post Undeleted by Glenn W9IQ
added 301 characters in body
Source Link
Glenn W9IQ
  • 5.6k
  • 12
  • 17

This seems painfully simple so I am probably overlooking something but I will give it a tryThanks for the good interaction via comments to your question in order to further illuminatebetter understand the design requirementsworking conditions and desired behavior of your proposed control circuit.

Here is a simple implementation of ESCin=5 volts * %V{limit} * %R1 as we discussed via comments:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

One very important detail is that whatever I add should not be able to generate a phantom signal, i.e. Vout MUST be always less or equal to Vin, even in the event of software bugs and reasonable hardware failures.

It certainly meets this requirement. The only failure mode is if Vlimit has the possibility of exceeding 5 volts.

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. Whether or not this is significant depends uponBut since the type ofoperator's feedback used by the operator e.g.is sensory feedback vs dial set point, this may have minimal impact, particularly if you can ramp in your Vlimit control voltage via your ADC. This also goes

Another version of this would be to the question I asked in comments regardingtake the rate of changewiper output of the pot, resistively scale it if necessary, and then use that as the Vlimitref and a better description offor the applicationADC. You can also add common mode decoupled buffers as necessary to ensure low noise inputs throughout.

This seems painfully simple so I am probably overlooking something but I will give it a try in order to further illuminate the design requirements:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

One very important detail is that whatever I add should not be able to generate a phantom signal, i.e. Vout MUST be always less or equal to Vin, even in the event of software bugs and reasonable hardware failures.

It certainly meets this requirement. The only failure mode is if Vlimit has the possibility of exceeding 5 volts.

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. Whether or not this is significant depends upon the type of feedback used by the operator e.g. sensory feedback vs dial set point. This also goes to the question I asked in comments regarding the rate of change of Vlimit and a better description of the application.

Thanks for the good interaction via comments to your question in order to better understand the working conditions and desired behavior of your proposed control circuit.

Here is a simple implementation of ESCin=5 volts * %V{limit} * %R1 as we discussed via comments:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

One very important detail is that whatever I add should not be able to generate a phantom signal, i.e. Vout MUST be always less or equal to Vin, even in the event of software bugs and reasonable hardware failures.

It certainly meets this requirement. The only failure mode is if Vlimit has the possibility of exceeding 5 volts.

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. But since the operator's feedback is sensory, this may have minimal impact, particularly if you can ramp in your Vlimit control voltage via your ADC.

Another version of this would be to take the wiper output of the pot, resistively scale it if necessary, and then use that as the Vref for the ADC. You can also add common mode decoupled buffers as necessary to ensure low noise inputs throughout.

Post Deleted by Glenn W9IQ
added 220 characters in body
Source Link
Glenn W9IQ
  • 5.6k
  • 12
  • 17

This seems painfully simple so I am probably overlooking something but I will give it a try in order to further illuminate the design requirements:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

One very important detail is that whatever I add should not be able to generate a phantom signal, i.e. Vout MUST be always less or equal to Vin, even in the event of software bugs and reasonable hardware failures.

It certainly meets this requirement. The only failure mode is if Vlimit has the possibility of exceeding 5 volts.

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. Whether or not this is significant depends upon the type of feedback used by the operator e.g. sensory feedback vs dial set point. This also goes to the question I asked in comments regarding the rate of change of Vlimit and a better description of the application.

This seems painfully simple so I am probably overlooking something but I will give it a try in order to further illuminate the design requirements:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. Whether or not this is significant depends upon the type of feedback used by the operator e.g. sensory feedback vs dial set point.

This seems painfully simple so I am probably overlooking something but I will give it a try in order to further illuminate the design requirements:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

One very important detail is that whatever I add should not be able to generate a phantom signal, i.e. Vout MUST be always less or equal to Vin, even in the event of software bugs and reasonable hardware failures.

It certainly meets this requirement. The only failure mode is if Vlimit has the possibility of exceeding 5 volts.

A potential disadvantage of this circuit is that the operator control range rescales. Whether or not this is significant depends upon the type of feedback used by the operator e.g. sensory feedback vs dial set point. This also goes to the question I asked in comments regarding the rate of change of Vlimit and a better description of the application.

added 220 characters in body
Source Link
Glenn W9IQ
  • 5.6k
  • 12
  • 17
Loading
Source Link
Glenn W9IQ
  • 5.6k
  • 12
  • 17
Loading