Skip to main content
Post Undeleted by D.A.S.
added 420 characters in body
Source Link
D.A.S.
  • 148k
  • 3
  • 56
  • 190

This is correct.

(DC) + (DB) = D(C + B)

Your choices are to;

  • ignore the fault, (input > 9) . x= don't care? or are there consequences?
  • display a fault ( error detect ) is it useful?
  • blank the display with flashing Dot or something( from erroneous data )
  • use a HEX LED converter and show result as a,b,c,d,e,f ( is that useful? )

Only you can tell if there are consequences of a fault condition but often fault detection is a good thing if you do something with it. Sometimes this is only done on a power On reset with JTAG tests. The higher the % fault detection (metric for Test Engineers, the better the design.

This is correct.

(DC) + (DB) = D(C + B)

This is correct.

(DC) + (DB) = D(C + B)

Your choices are to;

  • ignore the fault, (input > 9) . x= don't care? or are there consequences?
  • display a fault ( error detect ) is it useful?
  • blank the display with flashing Dot or something( from erroneous data )
  • use a HEX LED converter and show result as a,b,c,d,e,f ( is that useful? )

Only you can tell if there are consequences of a fault condition but often fault detection is a good thing if you do something with it. Sometimes this is only done on a power On reset with JTAG tests. The higher the % fault detection (metric for Test Engineers, the better the design.

Post Deleted by D.A.S.
Source Link
D.A.S.
  • 148k
  • 3
  • 56
  • 190

This is correct.

(DC) + (DB) = D(C + B)