Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 8, 2023 at 9:42 answer added user107063 timeline score: 0
May 15, 2019 at 2:31 vote accept penguin99
May 12, 2019 at 19:24 answer added jonk timeline score: 3
May 12, 2019 at 18:48 comment added jonk @noorav I already did all this in a three stage RC. So look here for a complete analysis process that you can follow for just two stages, as well. I could repost it here, but with just two stages. But can you use it to do this yourself?
May 12, 2019 at 17:22 history became hot network question
May 12, 2019 at 15:33 comment added D.A.S. @noorav I imagine you can solve it with four R values, or even 2, then replace R2 with Xc(s)
May 12, 2019 at 13:34 comment added Marko Buršič You would need a buffer (opamp G=1) in between sections A and B, to be able to multiply transfer functions, like in your example.
May 12, 2019 at 13:01 comment added Marcus Müller not that I'd be aware of. Do the full network analysis!
May 12, 2019 at 13:00 comment added penguin99 @Marcus Miller, is there any special formula for a loaded voltage divider?
May 12, 2019 at 12:43 answer added Verbal Kint timeline score: 4
May 12, 2019 at 12:17 comment added Marcus Müller yep, that's the formula for the unloaded voltage divider. But: assuming you can just cascade RC filters like that is a mistake we've all been through at least once. I sympathize! I think in this situation: try with a star-triangle transform, simplify a bit and then you have a single, different voltage divider that you can analyze.
May 12, 2019 at 12:11 comment added Chu No, you can't do that. There are loading effects. You could do (output impedance)/(input impedance).
May 12, 2019 at 12:03 history asked penguin99 CC BY-SA 4.0