Timeline for How does an active filter transfer function translate to a block diagram?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2020 at 8:33 | comment | added | LvW | Michael...no problem....misunderstandings cannot be avoided | |
| Apr 3, 2020 at 21:19 | history | edited | Yet Another Michael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Per LvQ suggestion, fixed answer
|
| Apr 3, 2020 at 21:19 | comment | added | Yet Another Michael | @LvW Excuse my mistake, I misremembered. You are correct, I have edited the response to fix this. | |
| Apr 2, 2020 at 16:24 | comment | added | LvW |
jDAQ..you misunderstood something. My comment was to Michaels claim: "...realizing impedances ..the opamps integrator like response is used". That means, he thinks that the real opamp`s frequency-dependent gain would be exploited - and this is not the case.
|
|
| Apr 2, 2020 at 15:59 | comment | added | jDAQ | @LvW "frequency/gain underneath the gain bandwidth product" he does that exactly to avoid reaching the limit of the amp op. | |
| Apr 2, 2020 at 14:42 | comment | added | LvW | Michael....are you sure? I have some experience with gyrator applications for active filters. However, I have never seen that somebody exploits the frequency-dependent gain of the opamps for this purpose. I rather think, active inductors and FDNR`s are designed assumng IDEAL opams only.. | |
| Apr 1, 2020 at 18:12 | history | answered | Yet Another Michael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |