Timeline for Q factor of rlc series circuit
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 17, 2020 at 8:52 | vote | accept | user215805 | ||
Jul 17, 2020 at 8:52 | vote | accept | user215805 | ||
Jul 17, 2020 at 8:52 | |||||
Jul 17, 2020 at 8:52 | vote | accept | user215805 | ||
Jul 17, 2020 at 8:52 | |||||
Jul 17, 2020 at 8:52 | vote | accept | user215805 | ||
Jul 17, 2020 at 8:52 | |||||
Jul 17, 2020 at 8:50 | comment | added | Andy aka | @user215805 have you done with this Q and A now? If so. please consider formally accepting an answer or, raise another comment if you need clarification about something. | |
Jul 11, 2020 at 3:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/1281785554091290629 | ||
Jul 11, 2020 at 0:35 | history | became hot network question | |||
Jul 10, 2020 at 19:12 | comment | added | Sanmveg saini | so, back when radio was new, I am talking about 19 and 20th century, to hear communication at some frequency, you have to tune into that frequency, generally you have to change the inductor value, and try to have high "Q factor" at that frequency of communication, so that you could hear that communication clearly, i.e. to have high "Quality" communication. And we still are using this term, because why not, it is very handy. And this is the idea behind introducing Q-factor | |
Jul 10, 2020 at 18:39 | answer | added | user136077 | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 10, 2020 at 17:16 | answer | added | Andy aka | timeline score: 6 | |
Jul 10, 2020 at 16:51 | answer | added | D.A.S. | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 10, 2020 at 16:41 | comment | added | user215805 | Thanks, but what we achieve by getting right Q, why it is so important? | |
Jul 10, 2020 at 16:36 | comment | added | Andy aka | Higher Q doesn't mean better. The right Q for the job is what is needed. | |
Jul 10, 2020 at 16:33 | history | asked | user215805 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |