Timeline for Controlling for ambient temperature changes in a transimpedance amplifier
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2020 at 9:20 | comment | added | KalleMP | Changing between photo-conduction and photovoltaic modes changes the transfer function and sensitivity a lot and may not be a practical option in all cases. The noise characteristics also change and may recommend a change one way or the other sometimes. | |
| Oct 31, 2020 at 2:39 | comment | added | The Photon | Photoconductive will be faster (which probably doesn't matter in this application) but noisier. In my experience if an optical setup has temperature dependence, the first place to look is for physical motion of the optics coupling light into the photodetector. | |
| Oct 30, 2020 at 23:55 | comment | added | TimWescott | Answer edited. But the truth is, it just feels right to me. So -- I could be all wet. But I still think I'm right! | |
| Oct 30, 2020 at 23:54 | history | edited | TimWescott | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 641 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2020 at 23:47 | comment | added | Cam.Davidson.Pilon | Thanks for the suggestion, Tim. Can you explain why I want to use the photoconductive mode for this problem? | |
| Oct 30, 2020 at 23:43 | history | answered | TimWescott | CC BY-SA 4.0 |