Timeline for Ohm's law paradox?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2021 at 11:17 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 4, 2021 at 3:07 | |||||
| Feb 25, 2021 at 11:12 | vote | accept | theber | ||
| Feb 25, 2021 at 11:05 | comment | added | theber | I understand the value of two resistors in parallel. I'm looking for a way to get around the real-life measurement limitations. | |
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:59 | history | edited | JRE | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:57 | answer | added | JRE | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:56 | answer | added | devnull | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:48 | comment | added | AlexVB | You just can't measure a resistor resistance with an ohm-meter when there is more than one path from one end of a resistor to another. And you do have another path - via R2 and the jumper. You measure combined resistance of the two parallel paths. | |
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:42 | history | edited | winny | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Ohm = surname, ohm = unit
|
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:32 | comment | added | Criticizing Israel not allowed | Probably, but you are asking a maths question | |
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:31 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 25, 2021 at 13:02 | |||||
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:28 | comment | added | Andy aka | There is no paradox. | |
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:27 | comment | added | JRE | You have the correct resistance. The jumper around R1 and R2 puts the two resistors in parallel. | |
| Feb 25, 2021 at 10:24 | history | asked | theber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |