Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 6, 2021 at 6:05 comment added JRaef spuck is correct. Powering the DC motor under normal operations would introduce more overall losses than powering an AC motor with an inverter only in emergencies. Plus the DC motor will have brushes and a commutator that needs servicing on a regular basis, or you must buy a WAY more expensive PMDC motor.
Oct 4, 2021 at 22:38 answer added Harper - Reinstate Monica timeline score: 3
Oct 4, 2021 at 17:19 comment added spuck How will the less efficient DC motor be powered from AC during the 99% of the time it's running during normal operation? It seems like that outweighs any conversion losses of the DC->AC inverter used during the 1% of the time.
Oct 4, 2021 at 15:01 answer added manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact timeline score: 1
Oct 4, 2021 at 12:39 comment added J... Agreed with @Hearth there are far more ways this could blow up in your face than there are ways to make it actually work. Be very careful.
Oct 4, 2021 at 12:03 comment added brhans Don't forget that you're also going to have to supply 24V to the control electronics in the furnace.
Oct 4, 2021 at 10:58 history became hot network question
Oct 4, 2021 at 7:47 history edited winny CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Oct 4, 2021 at 6:59 answer added Marko Buršič timeline score: 1
Oct 4, 2021 at 3:46 answer added user57037 timeline score: 13
Oct 4, 2021 at 3:35 comment added jsotola @Hearth I think that the combustion and the blower are more or less totally separate ... the wall thermostat turns on the gas ... the blower is controlled by a temperature sensor in the fire box ... if the blower fails, then the over temperature sensor shuts off the gas
Oct 4, 2021 at 3:27 answer added user80875 timeline score: 4
Oct 4, 2021 at 2:57 comment added Hearth I'd be very concerned about modifying a furnace in any way at all--mess things up and the gas could leak out unburned.
Oct 4, 2021 at 2:55 history asked Peggy Schafer CC BY-SA 4.0