Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 7, 2021 at 3:05 history edited hacktastical CC BY-SA 4.0
added 236 characters in body
Nov 7, 2021 at 3:01 comment added hacktastical I propose a solution here: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/593812/…
Nov 6, 2021 at 10:39 comment added David Maher Let us continue this discussion in chat.
Nov 6, 2021 at 5:27 comment added hacktastical See your other Q. I had to think about it for a bit.
Nov 6, 2021 at 3:34 comment added David Maher A PWM, control would be fantastic Hacktastical, but I'm afraid that without some sort of diagram, it would be beyond my current capability. Are you volunteering? I'm a regular visitor to the Dunhackin website, and I have got many valuable resources from there.
Nov 5, 2021 at 23:35 comment added hacktastical This site had some good diagrams: dunhackin.com/index.php/velocette-documents/mac-manuals/…
Nov 5, 2021 at 23:34 comment added hacktastical It would be an interesting project to make a PWM control for the field coil that models the way the old regulator works. Basically, sense the voltage, and if it gets above a threshold, start interrupting the field coil current. Maybe a comparator, a 555, and a good-sized FET?
Nov 5, 2021 at 21:08 comment added David Maher ..... and increase the load on the motor.
Nov 5, 2021 at 21:07 comment added David Maher Your solution that you have proposed at vintagetriumphsupply.com/… would work, as would matchlessclueless.com/electrical/lucas/regulator-replacement . The latter is a DVR2 regulator, which is commonly used on Vintage bikes. I was already aware of these options, but was hoping for a less expensive option (I know it's not sheep stations anyway). After a bit of thought, I realize that using a buck boost solution would require the field coil to be energized continually, which would both put unnecessary strain on the dynamo.
Nov 5, 2021 at 20:35 history edited hacktastical CC BY-SA 4.0
added 52 characters in body
Nov 5, 2021 at 18:47 history edited hacktastical CC BY-SA 4.0
added 179 characters in body
Nov 5, 2021 at 10:16 comment added David Maher You are right and this is exactly the plan that I was going to follow. I'm sorry that I don't have enough points to up vote your answer. I was trying to use a solid state solution instead of a pseudo mechanical regulator.
Nov 5, 2021 at 6:36 history edited hacktastical CC BY-SA 4.0
added 106 characters in body
Nov 5, 2021 at 6:25 history answered hacktastical CC BY-SA 4.0