Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 25, 2021 at 15:44 comment added WhatRoughBeast About the only people who are even remotely interested in "physical direction" are those who work with particle beam accelerators and people running welding machines. Oh, and people designing solid-state devices, too.
Nov 25, 2021 at 14:19 comment added The Pointer @SpiRail Ok, thanks for the clarification.
Nov 25, 2021 at 13:19 comment added SpiRail I've not heard anyone say "physical current" outside of school textbooks. You don't need to say "physical" and "conventional". Current is always (+to-), Just like Voltage for that matter. Then use "Election flow" for the cases when its really necessary do describe what happens at the atomic scale. (i.e.: physics of junctions and batteries, e.t.c.)
Nov 25, 2021 at 11:06 vote accept The Pointer
Nov 25, 2021 at 11:02 comment added The Pointer Oops, that was a typo: it should be "physical direction of the current (- to +)" and "conventional direction of the current (+ to -)." Yes, it seems I misinterpreted your illustration.
Nov 25, 2021 at 10:49 comment added SpiRail @ThePointer. Yes elections flow in the opposite direction to the current. Its best to just always go with the + to - current flow when talking about things at this scale. Many electrical engineers wish they could go back in time and fix the current flow direction: xkcd.com/567
Nov 25, 2021 at 10:46 history edited SpiRail CC BY-SA 4.0
added 557 characters in body
Nov 25, 2021 at 10:46 comment added Justme @ThePointer current flows identically. You are now mixing that with flow of electrons which is opposite to current.
Nov 25, 2021 at 10:42 comment added The Pointer In your illustrations, you're showing the physical direction of the current (+ to -), but the conventional direction of the current (- to +), as used in electronics, would go in the opposite direction, right?
Nov 25, 2021 at 10:38 history answered SpiRail CC BY-SA 4.0