Timeline for Controller anti-windup test cases
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2021 at 21:20 | comment | added | Pete W | Large amplitude square wave input is the most obvious test. If there are particularly conservative input rate limits or input LPF, disabling those for the purpose of the test can help ensure saturation. Last resort, again for testing the ARW... increase gain. | |
| Dec 7, 2021 at 14:48 | comment | added | user16324 | Test cases will probably depend on use cases. Something I'd expect to find through analysis, not on a shelf or in a toolkit. | |
| Dec 7, 2021 at 10:17 | history | edited | mikebuba | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 7, 2021 at 10:14 | comment | added | Marko Buršič | The same maybe? Why should this PID be so different? | |
| Dec 7, 2021 at 9:40 | comment | added | mikebuba | As in unit-testing. For example, for testing PI dynamic behavior I put step function at the input, use my PI block and first-order process in a closed-loop. I do the same closed-loop with Simulink PI block and compare outputs on the same scope. What type of signal should I put for testing anti-windup? | |
| Dec 7, 2021 at 9:34 | comment | added | Andy aka | Test-case? What do you mean? | |
| Dec 7, 2021 at 9:30 | history | asked | mikebuba | CC BY-SA 4.0 |