Skip to main content
deleted 13 characters in body
Source Link
Andy aka
  • 473.1k
  • 29
  • 383
  • 839

It seems you are going to more trouble than its worth using a BJT. Why not try something like this instead: -

enter image description here

You may need to make the zener voltage 6.8 volts to get the same activation point and, it will be equally "sloppy" in fading-on rather than having a clear-cut on/off transition but, that's to be expected with imprecise components like Zeners and BJTs.

How would I achieve a sharper switching, like the led is fully lit at 9.2V and fully off at 9.1V?

If you want a better circuit you should use a comparator and voltage reference. The gain of the transistor has nothing to do with how your current circuit differentiated between on and off. Maybe use a comparator like the LM311: -

enter image description here

Image from here.

If you replace the NTC thermistor with a precision shunt voltage reference (many to choose from) and set the pot to the "trigger-point" of 9.15 volts then it should be very sharp in response. You can even use multiple comparators to get a "several" level deep LED response: -

enter image description here

Image from here.

It seems you are going to more trouble than its worth using a BJT. Why not try something like this instead: -

enter image description here

You may need to make the zener voltage 6.8 volts to get the same activation point and, it will be equally "sloppy" in fading-on rather than having a clear-cut on/off transition but, that's to be expected with imprecise components like Zeners and BJTs.

How would I achieve a sharper switching, like the led is fully lit at 9.2V and fully off at 9.1V?

If you want a better circuit you should use a comparator and voltage reference. The gain of the transistor has nothing to do with how your current circuit differentiated between on and off.

It seems you are going to more trouble than its worth using a BJT. Why not try something like this instead: -

enter image description here

You may need to make the zener voltage 6.8 volts to get the same activation point and, it will be equally "sloppy" in fading-on rather than having a clear-cut on/off transition but, that's to be expected with imprecise components like Zeners and BJTs.

How would I achieve a sharper switching, like the led is fully lit at 9.2V and fully off at 9.1V?

If you want a better circuit you should use a comparator and voltage reference. The gain of the transistor has nothing to do with how your current circuit differentiated between on and off. Maybe use a comparator like the LM311: -

enter image description here

Image from here.

If you replace the NTC thermistor with a precision shunt voltage reference (many to choose from) and set the pot to the "trigger-point" of 9.15 volts then it should be very sharp in response. You can even use multiple comparators to get a "several" level deep LED response: -

enter image description here

Image from here.

Post Undeleted by Andy aka
deleted 13 characters in body
Source Link
Andy aka
  • 473.1k
  • 29
  • 383
  • 839

It seems you are going to more trouble than its worth using a BJT. Why not try something like this instead: -

enter image description hereenter image description here

You may need to make the zener voltage more like 106.8 volts to get the same activation point and, it will be equally "sloppy" in fading on-on rather than having a clear-cut on/off transition but, that's to be expected with imprecise components like Zeners and BJTs.

How would I achieve a sharper switching, like the led is fully lit at 9.2V and fully off at 9.1V?

If you want a better circuit you should use a comparator and voltage reference. The gain of the transistor has nothing to do with how your current circuit differentiated between on and off.

It seems you are going to more trouble than its worth using a BJT. Why not try something like this instead: -

enter image description here

You may need to make the zener voltage more like 10 volts to get the same activation point and, it will be equally "sloppy" in fading on rather than having a clear-cut on/off transition but, that's to be expected with imprecise components like Zeners and BJTs.

How would I achieve a sharper switching, like the led is fully lit at 9.2V and fully off at 9.1V?

If you want a better circuit you should use a comparator and voltage reference. The gain of the transistor has nothing to do with how your current circuit differentiated between on and off.

It seems you are going to more trouble than its worth using a BJT. Why not try something like this instead: -

enter image description here

You may need to make the zener voltage 6.8 volts to get the same activation point and, it will be equally "sloppy" in fading-on rather than having a clear-cut on/off transition but, that's to be expected with imprecise components like Zeners and BJTs.

How would I achieve a sharper switching, like the led is fully lit at 9.2V and fully off at 9.1V?

If you want a better circuit you should use a comparator and voltage reference. The gain of the transistor has nothing to do with how your current circuit differentiated between on and off.

Post Deleted by Andy aka
Source Link
Andy aka
  • 473.1k
  • 29
  • 383
  • 839

It seems you are going to more trouble than its worth using a BJT. Why not try something like this instead: -

enter image description here

You may need to make the zener voltage more like 10 volts to get the same activation point and, it will be equally "sloppy" in fading on rather than having a clear-cut on/off transition but, that's to be expected with imprecise components like Zeners and BJTs.

How would I achieve a sharper switching, like the led is fully lit at 9.2V and fully off at 9.1V?

If you want a better circuit you should use a comparator and voltage reference. The gain of the transistor has nothing to do with how your current circuit differentiated between on and off.