Timeline for How to interface TMDS signal with optical tranceivers at low cost?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2022 at 2:20 | history | edited | jw_ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
source of photo added
|
| Nov 2, 2022 at 1:29 | history | edited | SamGibson♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Updated the link to point to the webpage with the text being quoted.
|
| Nov 2, 2022 at 1:25 | comment | added | SamGibson♦ | jw_ - Thanks, so now you can accept your answer (i.e. add the "green tick") to show this is your solution to your question. Since you have now added a photo, it is required to add a link back to the original source of the image (e.g. link to the original webpage containing that photo), unless you took the photo yourself. | |
| Nov 2, 2022 at 1:17 | comment | added | jw_ | @SamGibson The link is accesible now and I'v included the link detail. | |
| Nov 2, 2022 at 1:16 | history | edited | jw_ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
link detail included
|
| Nov 2, 2022 at 1:01 | comment | added | SamGibson♦ | jw_ - I see. So if the answer to your question is that first sentence of your self-answer, please accept your answer, as I linked in my previous comment, so that it's clear to readers that this is the conclusion of your question. Or is there a reason why you don't want to do that? I'm just trying to clarify the status of the question for future readers. Thanks. | |
| Nov 2, 2022 at 0:49 | comment | added | jw_ | @SamGibson I didn't include the detail since the answer is the first sentence. And the example is FYI. Now I notice the example is important to be a answer to the OP but the link is not accessible now. | |
| Aug 28, 2022 at 15:20 | comment | added | SamGibson♦ | jw_ - Hi, Unfortunately this self-answer is getting flagged by other site members, due to (a) being very short, (b) no part of the linked article is included in the answer (so if the link dies, it becomes useless), and (c) if this really is the conclusion to your question, then you should áccept it, to indicate that the topic is concluded. Therefore, as a minimum, if you don't want to add more detail to this post, at least áccept it to show that you (as the OP) consider it to be the final conclusion of your question. Thanks. | |
| Aug 28, 2022 at 7:47 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Aug 28, 2022 at 15:27 | |||||
| Aug 28, 2022 at 7:26 | history | answered | jw_ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |