Timeline for KiCad unconnected while connected by footprint?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2022 at 8:29 | history | edited | ocrdu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body; edited title
|
| Dec 19, 2022 at 8:09 | answer | added | Russell McMahon♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 19, 2022 at 8:07 | comment | added | Russell McMahon♦ | A bad way that works is to provide an ultrafine track that will always edtch away - the manufacturer needs to know about this. || Another way is to have a track with a hole drilled in it - manufacturer also needs to know. | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 17:42 | vote | accept | Francois | ||
| Dec 18, 2022 at 16:32 | answer | added | Seth | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 15:24 | answer | added | Andy aka | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 15:07 | comment | added | Hearth | Unless your board is unusually sensitive, this should be perfectly fine to ignore. | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 14:38 | comment | added | Andy aka | You need to show all the pins schematically and, link them all to Vdd. | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 14:34 | comment | added | user1850479 | Two pins with the same net means they need to be connected. As far as I know there is no way to tell kicad that pads are connected internally. I think you either ignore it or create two VDD nets (1 and 2) and note in the schematic that they're internally connected. If no one surprises me with a solution I'll type this up as an answer. | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 14:31 | comment | added | Francois | Let my know if it would be better to include the whole schematic, I added the battery section for now. | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 14:30 | history | edited | Francois | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add the schematic view of the battery
|
| Dec 18, 2022 at 14:25 | comment | added | Andy aka | How is it represented schematically? | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 14:24 | history | asked | Francois | CC BY-SA 4.0 |