Timeline for Maintaining voltage on PCB track
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 20, 2023 at 7:48 | comment | added | datenheim | Hm, still wondering about your point. Voltage loss, current loss, power loss is interdependent on each other. With ideal conductor, ideal isolator and ideal source there is none of the losses. As soon as one of those is non-ideal, losses creep in. Your task when going passive is thus: make it ideal! Reduce resistance (wide tracks), increase isolation (large track-to-track distance, PCB with high isolation and low creepage), reduce current, reduce frequency. | |
Jan 19, 2023 at 20:51 | vote | accept | Curious Cosmopolitan | ||
Jan 19, 2023 at 13:41 | answer | added | Criticizing Israel not allowed | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 19, 2023 at 6:48 | comment | added | Curious Cosmopolitan | @datenheim! This is more of a theoritical question, just meant to ask, "How to maintain voltage at the far end in case of PCBs where voltage loss is obvious due to the tracks?" Rest are just the details to complete the question and avoid comments like there is no load. | |
Jan 19, 2023 at 3:39 | comment | added | Kyle B | If a single trace is inadequate to support the current load w/o voltage droop, and there's no room on the PCB for a fat, wide trace, you can simply use low-tech WIRE to jump the gap. You can drive quite alot of current through, say, an 18-gauge wire before the voltage loss becomes noticable. | |
Jan 18, 2023 at 23:33 | comment | added | Tim Williams | You have defined no load on the track therefore the current is zero, the voltage is constant, and the power is zero. | |
Jan 18, 2023 at 23:32 | history | edited | JYelton | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Spacing
|
Jan 18, 2023 at 23:31 | answer | added | Justme | timeline score: 5 | |
Jan 18, 2023 at 23:03 | comment | added | datenheim | Is this a theoretical or more practical question? | |
Jan 18, 2023 at 22:41 | comment | added | Eugene Sh. | The voltage drop also depends on the current. Don't make long thin traces that are supposed to carry high currents. | |
Jan 18, 2023 at 22:40 | comment | added | Hearth | Make the track bigger. Reduce current. Make the track shorter. Double the track on other layers. | |
Jan 18, 2023 at 22:38 | history | asked | Curious Cosmopolitan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |