Timeline for What is the transfer function of electroabsorption modulators?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2023 at 12:00 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | Not sure that is the case! I also don't think your implication makes much sense: phase will always depend, for any kind of device, on geometry. | |
| May 19, 2023 at 16:45 | comment | added | CLAUDE | Thanks Marcus for your expansive reply. Based on your explanation and the fact that the phase of EML modulators are highly dependant to their geometry I guess that these modulators are only used for IMDD and intensity detection, not for IQ modulation using some pulse shaping, e.g., roor raised cosine etc. Am I right? | |
| May 19, 2023 at 16:42 | vote | accept | CLAUDE | ||
| May 18, 2023 at 20:38 | comment | added | Marcus Müller | Note that I'm not a physicist. These texts are heavy for me as well; but you keep insisting that deriving the E-field strength from the intensity transfer function and tacking a phase to it isn't good enough for you, so, well, semiconductor physics is the answer to that. | |
| May 18, 2023 at 20:36 | history | answered | Marcus Müller | CC BY-SA 4.0 |