Timeline for Do non-polarized capacitors need to be in any type of orientation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 28, 2023 at 20:03 | comment | added | Spehro 'speff' Pefhany | @StealthRT Looks good. | |
Nov 28, 2023 at 19:23 | vote | accept | StealthRT | ||
Nov 28, 2023 at 19:19 | comment | added | StealthRT | Thanks for the advice. I'll go ahead and change them to UMK325BJ106KM-P and EMK325BJ226MM-P. | |
Nov 28, 2023 at 19:10 | comment | added | Spehro 'speff' Pefhany | Yes, they don't suggest using tantalum or low-ESR electrolytic unless you have such a 'certain application' that is suitable (and it's up to you to confirm that it's a suitable application). Because they're generally inferior. In any case, if you want to take a chance with the tantalum caps, getting the polarity correct is essential. As others have said, the PCB should have markings indicating the positive side and the parts should be populated correctly wrt those markings. Replacing the tantalum parts with ceramic X7R or X5R parts will avoid both issues. | |
Nov 28, 2023 at 18:56 | comment | added | StealthRT | It mentions this in the datasheet: Refer to Table 1 for C1 and C2 capacitor values. For certain applications, increased values and/or tantalum or low ESR electrolytic capacitors may also be used instead; | |
Nov 28, 2023 at 18:52 | history | answered | Spehro 'speff' Pefhany | CC BY-SA 4.0 |