Timeline for Physically Large vs Small Capacitors
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4 at 22:24 | answer | added | Spehro 'speff' Pefhany | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 4 at 22:12 | comment | added | JYelton | Somewhat related: electronics.stackexchange.com/q/79007/2028 | |
| Mar 4 at 22:01 | history | edited | s0ggyj0hns0n | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 199 characters in body
|
| Mar 4 at 22:00 | answer | added | vir | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 4 at 21:14 | comment | added | DamienWontContributeToAITheft | For MLCC capacitors, smaller packages will have lower effective capacitance with DC bias applied: community.infineon.com/t5/Knowledge-Base-Articles/… | |
| Mar 4 at 20:57 | answer | added | Andy aka | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 4 at 20:52 | comment | added | winny | Physically smaller capsules generally have lower ESL. Buy which type are we talking about? MLCC, plastic, electrolytic? | |
| Mar 4 at 20:51 | comment | added | Justme | Which capacitors you are talking about - electrolytic, ceramic, polymer, tantalum, plastic, or some other type of capacitor? Do you want comparison within that one type, e.g. electrolytic, or between those types, like comparing between electrolytic and ceramic? | |
| Mar 4 at 20:47 | history | asked | s0ggyj0hns0n | CC BY-SA 4.0 |