Timeline for PT1000 drifts more than 100°C
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1 at 18:18 | comment | added | Transistor | @mbrig, (1) that box appears to be a subset of everything (which heats up to 135°C) and (2) that the expectation doesn't seem to match the measurements. | |
| May 1 at 17:47 | comment | added | mbrig | @Transistor the question says "The box should be sealed and thermally isolated so we don't expect the temperature to rise over 100°C inside". What part of that is unclear? | |
| May 1 at 12:16 | comment | added | Chris H | I'd want some independent verification of the temperature the inside reaches. A mechanical thermometer with a maximum temperature indicator is a fairly boring solution. One idea that appeals to me is putting a tidy piece of Fields metal or even candle wax in there. They'll melt around 60°C. Rose's metal gets you 100°C. This would be in addition to logging the internal temperature electronically. | |
| May 1 at 9:05 | comment | added | jpa | @Barry By having thermal mass, isolation and limited time of operation. But I agree it should be verified. | |
| Apr 30 at 22:29 | comment | added | Barry | If the sealed box is in a chamber that heats up to 135C, how does the inside of the box not go above 90C? | |
| Apr 30 at 20:43 | history | edited | Transistor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
| Apr 30 at 20:42 | comment | added | Transistor | It's not clear in your question. Edit required. | |
| Apr 30 at 20:41 | comment | added | Felix Kunz | The outside (where the PT1000 is) heats up to 135°C. Inside shouldn't. We did some measurements in the past and measured maximal 85-90°C in the box. This was without electronics tough. | |
| Apr 30 at 20:38 | history | answered | Transistor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |