Timeline for How can I properly use PWM to observe hopefully >= 2x normal efficacy, seeing the theoretical max of 1700 lm/W scotopic efficacy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19 at 1:43 | comment | added | user1850479 | @MicroservicesOnDDD If one is in poverty than it is doubly important to be cost effective, which is why using an inexpensive standard LED source would be a better choice. Likewise, a feature of the very low current is that the efficiency is much less important, hence my point that making the device expensive in order to save a very small amount of power is a poor design choice. | |
| Aug 19 at 1:32 | comment | added | MicroservicesOnDDD | When a person in the third world has no electricity, and must work all month for a set of batteries, a device working on these principles would allow study at night to lift ones-self out of poverty. The ultra low current is a feature, not a bug. Perhaps you are not qualified to judge as you have. Remember, you're fortunate to be among the wealthy few in the world, and you have a responsibility to help others. (because you can). | |
| Jun 19 at 22:00 | history | edited | user1850479 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 134 characters in body
|
| Jun 19 at 20:02 | history | answered | user1850479 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |