Timeline for Component verification about circuit breaker
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7 at 1:05 | comment | added | Tom | Thank you for your further information. | |
| Sep 6 at 13:49 | comment | added | SamGibson♦ | @Tom - Re: "Could it be that the description of "SB?" was mistaken by ST?" Personally, in this context, I doubt that :) I really do mean mistranslation is the likely cause here, IMHO. The words "circuit breaker" should have been spotted as incorrect terminology in this context, by a native English-speaking engineer. That leads me to conclude a language issue (i.e. mistranslation) is a likely reason for that mistake in terminology. Just to be clear, I'm suggesting the mistranslation occurred within ST, which is how it can appear within an official ST schematic's BOM. | |
| Sep 6 at 13:49 | history | edited | SamGibson♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added more info and link to previous related question.
|
| Sep 6 at 12:49 | comment | added | Tom | I don't quite understand what you mean by "mistranslation." My understanding of "translation" is converting text from one language to another, such as translating Chinese into English. The ST Microelectronics Nucleo-64 STM32 development boards are provided by ST official sources. Could it be that the description of "SB?" was mistaken by ST? | |
| Sep 6 at 11:45 | history | edited | SamGibson♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added more info.
|
| Sep 6 at 11:44 | vote | accept | Tom | ||
| Sep 6 at 11:32 | history | edited | SamGibson♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Sep 6 at 11:26 | history | answered | SamGibson♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |