Skip to main content

Timeline for LED driver safety

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 23, 2014 at 18:29 comment added JRobert Erwin Schrödinger, where are you when we need you?
Feb 21, 2014 at 2:19 answer added FiddyOhm timeline score: 0
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:44 review Suggested edits
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:47
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:38 history protected Kortuk
Sep 23, 2013 at 17:11 answer added Andy aka timeline score: 1
Sep 23, 2013 at 15:27 comment added Emilien I'm not sure if the voltage keeps rising (I cannot check this at the moment), but I guess that's how a constant current source should behave, so it probably raises to 75V.
Sep 23, 2013 at 15:16 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackElectronix/status/382161591934132224
Sep 23, 2013 at 14:54 comment added PeterJ I upvoted your question because I look forward to informed answers, but I suspect it won't be as clear-cut as you expect and I'm not qualified to answer myself. But I do look forward to reaading good answers.
Sep 23, 2013 at 14:53 comment added Joe Hass What happens to the voltage from your driver if one of the LEDs fails to an open circuit? Does the voltage just keep rising, trying to push 680mA?
Sep 23, 2013 at 14:30 comment added Emilien What is the max DC output ({voltage,current}, or max. power?) that would be considered safe? Indeed there is a risk for the fish. I rely on the fact that the cat is lazy and will probably get bored very fast. However he is also curious and does weird things (like licking the border of my windows...?) so he might lick the wires as well.
Sep 23, 2013 at 13:31 comment added PeterJ The 36-75V / 680mA max output of that driver is above what would be considered 100% safe. But I must ask (jokingly) if your cat can get his tongue in the tank isn't there an additional risk to the fish as well?
Sep 23, 2013 at 13:26 review First posts
Sep 23, 2013 at 13:32
Sep 23, 2013 at 13:09 history asked Emilien CC BY-SA 3.0