Timeline for Looking for an inexpensive Smoke Detection Sensor
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2011 at 10:13 | history | edited | tyblu | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
don't use an interruptor as the signal must be normally 'OFF'.
|
| Jan 9, 2011 at 8:54 | comment | added | BarsMonster | Check here. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoke_detector Optical ones are way easier to implement. Ionization probably a bit better, but they cannot be cheap, as they need some radioactive elements. | |
| Jan 9, 2011 at 8:36 | comment | added | ThaKidd KG5ORD | So wait, are you telling me that smoke alarms you buy off of the shelf measure light to determine how 'smoke' is in the air? Guess I am lost. Figured this would be a different type of sensor. | |
| Jan 9, 2011 at 7:54 | history | answered | tyblu | CC BY-SA 2.5 |