1
\$\begingroup\$

Will the noise spectrum (at the LISN) due to switching of a Synchronous Buck DC-DC converter be different (peaks) if the converter is operating in DCM (Inductor current) compared to CCM keeping the converter same. CCM to DCM I did by increasing the load resistance.

\$\endgroup\$
8
  • \$\begingroup\$ It depends on the type of converter. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Apr 4 at 12:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ switching of a DC-DC converter What converter? Buck? Boost? Flyback? if the converter is operating in DCM (Inductor current) compared to CCM? At what input and output (loading) conditions? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4 at 12:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ Edited the question. It is a synchronous buck. Input stays the same. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andr7
    Commented Apr 4 at 12:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Andr7 EMI can be worse with DCM with high peak currents and sharp switching edges. However, quasi resonant operation can really mitigate most of that problem. I don't have a bright line answer. So I'll leave this to others. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4 at 12:58
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @Andyaka a sync buck will not operate in DCM. it will run in DCM when the low-side MOSFET is not driven (a.k.a. diode emulation). I mean, why should it need to? to improve light-load efficiency, maybe? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4 at 13:30

2 Answers 2

1
\$\begingroup\$

Here is a really quick and dirty simulation for you. Several downsides: no filters what so ever and would not transfer the same amount of power. Just the top switch waveform difference.

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think you should show the circuit you simulated. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Apr 4 at 14:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Andyaka Just two voltage sources with preset waveshape. \$\endgroup\$
    – winny
    Commented Apr 4 at 17:54
1
\$\begingroup\$

In a fixed frequency DC-DC converter, the components of the spectrum will always be rational multiples of the switching frequency. However, the amplitudes at each rational multiple of the switching frequency will depend upon the operating conditions of the converter. Changing between DCM and CCM will change the relative amplitudes of the components. However, even changing the duty ratio of the switch will change the amplitudes as well.

To a first approximation, the voltages and currents in a DC-DC converter are periodic with the switching frequency. Each periodic function has a Fourier series which (with a slight lie) is equal to that periodic function. All of the components of that Fourier series are multiples of the fundamental frequency. To a first approximation that fundamental frequency is the switching frequency.

To make matters slightly more refined, DC-DC converters may exhibit sub-multiple oscillations. For example, switching cycles may alternate between two different pulse widths. Or every third pulse may be skipped, etc. So, the fundamental frequency for a Fourier series may not be the switching frequency, but some submultiple of that frequency. (I suppose it is also possible that it be an irrational multiple of that frequency, but we usually don't extend our analysis that far).

In any event, changing the current or voltage waveform, doesn't change which frequencies are rational multiples of the switching frequency, but it will change the amplitudes (and phases!) of the various Fourier components.

[The little lie about Fourier series, is that the limit of the series does not always match the original waveform if the original waveform has jump discontinuities -- the reconstituted waveform may have "spikes". For example, the limit of the Fourier series for an exact square wave is not exactly a square wave, but a square wave with spikes at each transition. However, with a sufficient number of terms, the spikes become arbitrarily "narrow", but not arbitrarily small in amplitude". This effect is known as the Gibbs Phenomenon.]

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure about your last paragraph... \$\endgroup\$
    – Ben
    Commented Apr 4 at 15:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Ben, I'm sure sure what you are unsure about, but what I described is known as the Gibb's phenomenon. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_phenomenon \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4 at 15:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ My point is , if the spikes become arbitrarily narrow, does it make sense to define an amplitude? \$\endgroup\$
    – Ben
    Commented Apr 4 at 19:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Ben. If you have an approximately 9% spike height (above the table top height) with 10 terms, and an approximately 9% spike height with 100 terms, or a thousand terms or 10,000,000 terms, and you can prove that mathematically, the limit of the spike height as the number of terms goes to infinity is about 9%, then yes, it makes sense to say that the spike height is about 9%, even though the width approaches 0. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4 at 19:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ yeah it makes sense, sorry \$\endgroup\$
    – Ben
    Commented Apr 4 at 19:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.