Timeline for Why does the difference amplifier formula not work in this case?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Mar 12, 2016 at 10:32 | history | suggested | Pro Backup | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo corrected in title, thanks removed
|
Mar 12, 2016 at 9:47 | answer | added | Transistor | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 12, 2016 at 9:39 | comment | added | LvW | Daveythewavey, ask yourself for which reason you wanted to use the mentioned formula? Did you derive it? No. So - where does it come from? | |
Mar 12, 2016 at 9:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 12, 2016 at 10:32 | |||||
Mar 12, 2016 at 8:36 | answer | added | EM Fields | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 12, 2016 at 7:40 | answer | added | Massimo Ortolano | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 12, 2016 at 5:13 | comment | added | Nick Alexeev | (1) You are using a wrong equation for the output voltage. Notice that that this is not a differential OpAmp topology. To derive a correct formula, use the Kirchhoff's Current Law. (2) The rest of the enlightenment is in your own hands. After all, this is a homework. | |
Mar 12, 2016 at 4:41 | history | asked | Daveythewavey19 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |