Timeline for Common anode optocouplers protection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2017 at 10:42 | comment | added | Marko Buršič | @AlekseyMakarenko You're welcome. | |
| Mar 21, 2017 at 10:41 | history | edited | Marko Buršič | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 336 characters in body
|
| Mar 21, 2017 at 10:33 | vote | accept | Aleksey Makarenko | ||
| Mar 21, 2017 at 10:32 | comment | added | Aleksey Makarenko | Thank you very much, @MarkoBuršič, I consider the issue closed :) | |
| Mar 21, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | Marko Buršič | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 691 characters in body
|
| Mar 21, 2017 at 10:18 | comment | added | Marko Buršič | @AlekseyMakarenko I have updated the answer. | |
| Mar 21, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | Marko Buršič | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 691 characters in body
|
| Mar 21, 2017 at 0:43 | comment | added | Aleksey Makarenko | Thanks for quick answer. Yes, I read on some forums that optocouplers are pretty strong, but began to doubt, since the wires will be long (5 meters +-) and switched "on the fly", but in the VO2630 datasheet I did not find anything about the ESD immunity at the input, only common mode transient immunity and forward surge current - 200 mA, t=100us. So at first I wanted to stay with the "classical" solution, but I thought that there might be something more correct for the case with common anode and "ungrounded" cathode. | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 23:07 | history | answered | Marko Buršič | CC BY-SA 3.0 |