Timeline for SEPIC vs Cuk vs Zeta Converter
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Nov 28, 2018 at 2:47 | history | suggested | D. LaRocque | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Adjust the links for TI and analog.com
|
| Nov 27, 2018 at 22:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 28, 2018 at 2:47 | |||||
| Feb 1, 2018 at 17:31 | vote | accept | CraigC | ||
| Aug 10, 2018 at 15:07 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2018 at 18:58 | comment | added | D.A.S. | Also consider efficiency when |Vin|-|Vout| is near 0. And also consider 2 FET switches instead of 1 + diode. for synchronous ZVS | |
| Jan 29, 2018 at 18:57 | history | edited | D.A.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 29, 2018 at 18:51 | comment | added | D.A.S. | Yes but that depends on in - out differences and ratio or specs. Consider the application too and component ESR total effects on Zout, Zin and stability. PV regulator method should be ICT method for better performance | |
| Jan 29, 2018 at 18:33 | comment | added | CraigC | All three have the same waveforms, while the SEPIC and Zeta have the same equations. The Cuk is subtracting Vout while the other two are adding it, which makes it less stressful for the Diode and FET. Are their any other components that have lower/higher voltage/current ratings? | |
| Jan 29, 2018 at 17:25 | history | edited | D.A.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 972 characters in body
|
| Jan 29, 2018 at 17:03 | history | edited | D.A.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Jan 29, 2018 at 16:54 | history | answered | D.A.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |