Timeline for Why doesn't KVL work for the bottom loop?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2019 at 5:47 | vote | accept | aX10m | ||
| Dec 24, 2019 at 2:49 | answer | added | The Photon | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 24, 2019 at 2:36 | comment | added | brhans | You write " I could get the correct solution with current division" - but how??? There is no current division in the lower loop. It's a simple series circuit! | |
| Dec 24, 2019 at 2:32 | comment | added | D.A.S. | @jsotola because it is a CCVS | |
| Dec 24, 2019 at 2:24 | comment | added | The Photon | But yes, this should give the same result as jumping to the voltage divider formula, since the voltage divider formula can be derived from KVL. | |
| Dec 24, 2019 at 2:24 | comment | added | Juan | Photon, you got the answer please post it as one. | |
| Dec 24, 2019 at 2:23 | comment | added | The Photon | The current through the unknown resistor is 6/R, not 6R. | |
| Dec 24, 2019 at 2:13 | history | asked | aX10m | CC BY-SA 4.0 |