Timeline for High Frequency Square Wave Generator
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 28, 2020 at 4:46 | vote | accept | Ismail | ||
Sep 27, 2020 at 23:03 | answer | added | csabahu | timeline score: 1 | |
Sep 27, 2020 at 21:06 | answer | added | frr | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 27, 2020 at 20:19 | history | edited | Ismail | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
Sep 14, 2020 at 6:48 | answer | added | Arseniy | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 13, 2020 at 23:54 | answer | added | csabahu | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 13, 2020 at 17:51 | comment | added | Ismail | Actually you are right I was only considering about rise and fall times. So I didn't look at the real frequency. I am going to edit the question as soon as posible. | |
Sep 13, 2020 at 17:18 | review | Close votes | |||
Sep 24, 2020 at 3:08 | |||||
Sep 13, 2020 at 16:40 | answer | added | hacktastical | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 13, 2020 at 16:38 | comment | added | user16324 | "should stay high like 40 ns" and "500MHz" are mutually incompatible. (plus a 3ns rise time is already 1.5x the period) You'll need to clarify what you really want beyore worrying about how to do it. | |
Sep 13, 2020 at 16:38 | comment | added | Dave Tweed | Your timing values don't make any sense. The period of a 500 MHz signal is just 2 ns. | |
Sep 13, 2020 at 16:28 | history | asked | Ismail | CC BY-SA 4.0 |