Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
added 1629 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
kando
  • 437
  • 2
  • 9

Optimal selectionSelection of Indicator LED drive voltageDrive Voltage (Efficiency vs Reliability)

Background

When selecting a drive voltage for LEDs have varying forward voltages, overvoltage directly results in added loss whereas undervoltage results in failure to driveand the range can be significant.

Example: OSRAM LRTBGVSR RGB LED OSRAM LRTBGVSR : V.f @ I.f = 20 [mA] See the bottom line.

ForWhat is not provided is the statistical distribution of these tolerances.

enter image description here

How it is related

I am designing a battery-powered indicator LEDsLED matrix. Due to the battery, (where there are no redundant LEDsefficiency is critical; however, in contrast to anas there is only one LED matrixper indicator (no redundancies), is it generally recommendedall LEDs functioning is paramount.

This becomes an optimization problem:

Do I want to design accordingmy drive with respect to the maximum possible forward voltage of the LED suchpart, with the understanding that all LEDsthe great majority of parts will operateconsistently burn off the overvoltage?

(Remember: These are not simply losses of usable battery power — these losses also become heat generated within the driver IC. Ick.)

Do I am curious because there can beinstead make the bus voltage variable and form tests which determine whether the full current is going out to every LED (increasing the bus voltage until it does)?

Here, if the forward voltage tolerance distribution was known, I could at least try to select an initial driving voltage which, at some cost to efficiency (but no longer maximum cost), drove all LEDs for most units, leaving a wide rangestatistically manageable number of outliers afterward.

Actual Question

Do LED forward voltages and the losses canvoltage tolerance distributions tend to be significantequivalent, independent of the part series?

  • If so, where could these distributions be found?
  • If not, would manufacturers tend to know for specific parts?

Additional Information

The minimum LED driving voltage for my driver is equal to the forward voltage of the LED \$V_{led.f}\$ plus a portablespecified value, (battery-powered) device\$V_{driver.channel.knee}\$.

Example Example : OSRAM LRTBGVSRTI TLC6983 :(Constant current, PWM-capable LED driver)

enter image description hereTI TLC6983 : V.knee (table)

TI TLC6983 : V.knee (figure)

Optimal selection of LED drive voltage

When selecting a drive voltage for LEDs, overvoltage directly results in added loss whereas undervoltage results in failure to drive the LED.

For indicator LEDs, (where there are no redundant LEDs, in contrast to an LED matrix), is it generally recommended to design according to the maximum forward voltage of the LED such that all LEDs will operate?

I am curious because there can be a wide range of forward voltages and the losses can be significant for a portable (battery-powered) device.

Example: OSRAM LRTBGVSR :

enter image description here

Optimal Selection of Indicator LED Drive Voltage (Efficiency vs Reliability)

Background

LEDs have varying forward voltages, and the range can be significant.

Example: OSRAM LRTBGVSR RGB LED OSRAM LRTBGVSR : V.f @ I.f = 20 [mA] See the bottom line.

What is not provided is the statistical distribution of these tolerances.

enter image description here

How it is related

I am designing a battery-powered indicator LED matrix. Due to the battery, efficiency is critical; however, as there is only one LED per indicator (no redundancies), all LEDs functioning is paramount.

This becomes an optimization problem:

Do I want to design my drive with respect to the maximum possible forward voltage of the part, with the understanding that the great majority of parts will consistently burn off the overvoltage?

(Remember: These are not simply losses of usable battery power — these losses also become heat generated within the driver IC. Ick.)

Do I instead make the bus voltage variable and form tests which determine whether the full current is going out to every LED (increasing the bus voltage until it does)?

Here, if the forward voltage tolerance distribution was known, I could at least try to select an initial driving voltage which, at some cost to efficiency (but no longer maximum cost), drove all LEDs for most units, leaving a statistically manageable number of outliers afterward.

Actual Question

Do LED forward voltage tolerance distributions tend to be equivalent, independent of the part series?

  • If so, where could these distributions be found?
  • If not, would manufacturers tend to know for specific parts?

Additional Information

The minimum LED driving voltage for my driver is equal to the forward voltage of the LED \$V_{led.f}\$ plus a specified value, \$V_{driver.channel.knee}\$.

Example : TI TLC6983 (Constant current, PWM-capable LED driver)

TI TLC6983 : V.knee (table)

TI TLC6983 : V.knee (figure)

Source Link
kando
  • 437
  • 2
  • 9

Optimal selection of LED drive voltage

When selecting a drive voltage for LEDs, overvoltage directly results in added loss whereas undervoltage results in failure to drive the LED.

For indicator LEDs, (where there are no redundant LEDs, in contrast to an LED matrix), is it generally recommended to design according to the maximum forward voltage of the LED such that all LEDs will operate?

I am curious because there can be a wide range of forward voltages and the losses can be significant for a portable (battery-powered) device.

Example: OSRAM LRTBGVSR :

enter image description here