1
\$\begingroup\$

I assembled a "Portable Bluetooth Speaker" with of the shelf Bluetooth/MP3 module and tiny stereo amplifier (supposedly 10W per channel) plus battery pack. Both devices need 12 volt.

When they are connected to independent power supplies (either different batteries or power adapters) the sound is perfectly clear. But when connected to the same supply, the module seems to inject noise trough the power leads, which is picked by the amp.

I connected a headphone in series with a 10uF capacitor to the power input of the module and sure enough, the noise was heard. By noise I mean clicks and ticks, like an old modem or the sounds some speakers make when a cell phone receives a call nearby. When connecting the headphone directly to the module's output, the music is heard faintly but the noise is not noticeable, that's why I guess this noise is produced in the power input side of the circuit.

What alternatives do I have to reduce or minimize noise while feeding both components from a single battery?

I tried connecting some capacitors in parallel with the module with the hopes that the noise would pass through them and thus "short circuit" while leaving the DC alone but that did nothing. (tried several values 10uF, 4.7uF, 2.2uF, None of them seemed to even reduce the noise level)

For this particular BT/MP3 module, when using USB the noise is very low and almost inaudible at mid to high volume (The amp has it's own volume control), but when using BlueTooth the noise is so loud that it renders the whole thing unbearable.

The construction is as simple as can be:

Connection Schematic

Side-dish question: Why does this happen and why some combinations do not suffer from this? why these modules seem to inject noise from digital operation into the power rail?

For example, using another module type, I have 3 of them and installed one in my car, one in a boombox and one in a small 4-AA Battery powered active speaker. The three modules are the same "model". (The cheap 10 Dollar ones from China).

In the Boombox I had the same "digital noise" (repeating ticks and clicks that vary when I change modes on the module or skip tracks, etc). It disappeared if the module has powered from a separate source. I was feeding the audio through the volume control potentiometer, as the boombox has no "line in", but the sound was clear if I connected a cell phone or the same module but powered separately.

In the car I connect it through the head unit's "aux in" and the digital noise is audible but so faint that at normal listening volume plus road noise is not noticeable, however, I have to use one specific 12v to 5v adapter (a phone charger) because any other, either branded or generic, introduces "alternator whine" (I call it that because the pitch rises when engine RPM increases).

In the 4AA battery operated speaker, using essentially the same schematic as above, the sound is perfectly clear in any of the modes of the module, it does not show the problem at all!

The goal of my question is to achieve more enjoyable sound in my hobbyist audio projects and learn electronics concepts in the process.

Edit May 27th, 2022. I installed a dc-dc isolator into another, similar contraption that had the same issue, and it worked wonderfully. Noise is absolutely inaudible. I think this is the solution if you have affordable access to the isolator and/or if your goal is to finish the project quickly. At the moment, the component did cost about US$ 2.12 per unit and all it took was to snip a pair of wires and four solder points plus heatshrink, a 20 minute job. I still want to try the discrete component proposed solution to learn and compare.

This is what the isolator looks like:

enter image description here

Edit 2: After too long trying to obtain components I tried the same isolator model on this BT Speaker and it reduced the noise a lot, but it is still perceivable. Since This component worked fine on other similar projects, I'm leaning to believe this MP3 module is not designed to isolate noise. (Among other things, it has common power ground and audio signal ground)

\$\endgroup\$

4 Answers 4

2
\$\begingroup\$

The problem you are having is called 'ground loop noise'. The easiest solution is to use a single package DC-DC converter with isolated ground rails like B0505s to power the Bluetooth module. GreatScott has a good video on the possible solutions to the problem. Here's a link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_b_0BWP0mI&t=56s

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Today, applied this solution to another, similar contraption and it worked wonderfully, installation is straightforward and quick. However, I still want to try the other solution given, as to learn and compare the two. At the moment, the dc/dc isolator did cost about US$2.12 per unit. \$\endgroup\$
    – Jahaziel
    Commented May 27, 2022 at 20:19
1
\$\begingroup\$

It sounds as if the bluetooth model is indeed injecting HF spikes back UP the power supply which then gets into the amplifier. This seems to be strongly backed up by the fact that things are OK when you use separate power sources.

(If the amp is class D, it may well be that the problem is the other way - the switching noise from the amp gets into the bluetooth receiver. Or some combination of the two. In any case the solution is the same.)

The problem is that you won't be able to decouple this away because the series impedance along the power rail between the two modules is close to zero. So your power supply filtering has nothing to work against.

The best solution, other than using separate sources, will be to use LC filtering. Now the inductors create a high impedance to the noise, which in combination with caps, will decrease the interference between the two modules.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

DCA and DCB are the power rails going to the two modules. The values of the C's and L's need to be determined by considering the frequency of the interference and also (very important) the DC current of the two modules, so that the L's do not saturate.

You might also have to be careful with the layout of the DC distribution. Where you have long traces or wires, you don't want HF current there, because it will act like a transformer to any nearby circuits. So you want the LC filtering near the modules, with the caps large enough to supply all the transient current needed by the modules while maintaining stable enough voltage. This is typically a bit of a trial and error exercise. Sometimes more than one stage of filtering gets you there more easily.

Side dish : it's just down to the way that different circuits draw power. Class D amps are basically switch mode power supplies that change output voltage very fast (simplistic explanation but OK), so these guys draw current in a very "spiky" way with a lot of HF components.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Not my idea at all but i believe you need a 5v-5v converter suited to isolating and/or converting DC power rails as per this video: https://youtu.be/n_b_0BWP0mI

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ This is a link only answer. You should expand on it. Preferably in your own words. \$\endgroup\$
    – Passerby
    Commented Apr 8, 2021 at 2:27
0
\$\begingroup\$

If it is indeed ground loop noise as one answer suggested, the easiest way to fix it is to cut the loop. Based on the wiring diagram in the OP, simply isolate the shield at the amplifier end of the audio cables. The ground connection from the battery to the BT through the shield and back to the battery forms a loop antenna that picks up any RF and induces a current in that loop. The bigger the cross section area of the loop, the bigger the current! So reducing the loop area by running the ground wires close together as possible would be another way to reduce it. Less fundamentally correct, but would likely work, don't use the return ground wire on the BT module, just connect the 12V, and let the shield on the audio cables be the ground return. I said the BT rather than the amp, because the amp will be drawing significantly more current.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.