2
\$\begingroup\$

My circuit consists of two oscillators: one VCO in audio range and an LFO (low frequency oscillator - below the audio range). The signals from the two oscillators are amplified with two non-inverting op amp amplifiers. The two amps (LM358) share the same split voltage supply/virtual ground source. Because of that the LFO effects the frequency of the VCO. The two oscillators should be entirely independent. How can I avoid the two oscillators effecting each other?

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

3
\$\begingroup\$

R3 connects to the half rail supply but consider that it could be on its own half rail supply - instead of using one 8k2 for R3, use two 16k4 (or nearest preferred value); one down to ground and one up to 9V.

Ditto R11 - it can become two 16k2 resistors in the same way. The two half-rail generators are now independant.

About noise and interference

The proposal I've made will neither improve nor reduce the effects of noise and fluctuations on the 9V power supply. However this type of design could benefit from 100uF decoupling caps on the 9V near these chips.

\$\endgroup\$
0
4
\$\begingroup\$

At the very least, you want to reduce the equivalent resistance of your virtual ground.

You could repalce R14 with a 4.5 V zener or shunt regulator. However this would not track like your current setup if your 9V supply drifts. You might also need to worry about noise and thermal drift if you use a zener.

You could buffer the virtual ground with another op-amp configured as a voltage follower.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Or at least he should add a big enough capacitor whose AC resistance at the frequencies is much lower than R12 and R9. Of course buffering the split voltage is better. Even then I'd recommend a capacitor at the input of the buffer. \$\endgroup\$
    – Curd
    Commented Oct 11, 2013 at 17:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ @curd, since he said "sub-audio" frequencies, I assumed the required capacitor would be ridiculously large, but when I calculated it now I guess it's not too bad. Of course it depends how far "sub-audio" this needs to work. \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Oct 11, 2013 at 17:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.