0
\$\begingroup\$

I am now designing a power reverse polarity protection circuit for my system. I found that most methods used for the protection would cause voltage drop in the power path. Even the MOSFET, which has maybe 0.025ohm Rdon, would cause about 5mV drop(0.2A). Some may not cause voltage drop but would be a little complex or not resettable. http://www.wa0itp.com/revpro.html

Then I have a new thought(maybe new or maybe not). My design is showed below. My circuit has three power sources(+-12V and 0V). I add two diodes between +12 and 0V and between 0V and -12V with big enough series resistors.

Normally, the two diodes would turn off.No current would go through R1 and R2. So no voltage drop when normal operation. If the polarity is reverse,D1 and D2 would turn on. Current would go through the diodes.

Is there any problem in this circuit? Can it work?

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ This would work only if internal resistance of the voltage sources was much higher than 1k ohms. And after that, it would clamp at +0.7 for the negative rail and -0.7 for positive rail. \$\endgroup\$
    – venny
    Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 4:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ @venny: I am not so familiar with the power source internal resistance. What would be the normal value? Do you know it? \$\endgroup\$
    – billyzhao
    Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 4:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ There is no "normal" value. It depends on your power source. A lead acid battery would have a few milliohms internal resistance. But a wall plug for instance would have much, much more. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dejvid_no1
    Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 6:08

4 Answers 4

3
\$\begingroup\$

This DPST NO (2 form "A") relay solution will work:

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

The diodes will have no effect to speak of on reverse polarity, and will provide no protection. If the device is a chip, it will act like a forward biased diode, and will take almost all of the current compared to your parallel diode with 1K in series.

Edit: You can play with simulations below. With the left one I've simulated the 12V source (reversed) with 10m\$\Omega\$ source resistance (2mV drop at 200mA), and no load. The right circuit is the same except D6 represents a chip that you're trying to protect.

Voltage on the left circuit is -12.0V, with or without D1+R1

Voltage on the right circuit is -11.8V, with or without D1+R1, but now D6 (the chip that's supposed to be protected) is conducting about 19 amperes. It is not long for this world. In both cases D1 conducts little current (about 11mA).

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

There is no reason generally to worry about a few tens of mV drop on a power supply rail- usually the tolerances are much more. The MOSFET method is the best way for very low drop unless you know the source has limited current (in which case, consider a shunt Schottky), a series diode can work in some cases.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for you answer. But What do you mean? Could you explain it a little detail? \$\endgroup\$
    – billyzhao
    Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 4:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeap,I make a big mistake. Thank you for you answer! \$\endgroup\$
    – billyzhao
    Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 6:21
1
\$\begingroup\$

Thinking only the positive side of your circuit: assuming you use a normal diode with a voltage drop of 0.7V, GND and +12 reversed, the voltage across thq 1k resistor is U=RI => all remaining voltage will be over the resistor. Thus the protection doesnt work.

One way of doing this (better or worse) would be remove he 1k resistor and using a diode with as small voltage drop as possible, eg schottky diode. Voltagedrop across the "reverse protection line" has to be lower than voltage drop across reverse connected IC. Also you need a fuse wich prevents diode from burning up.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you. But fuse can not be reset automatically. Maybe it is not a good choice. \$\endgroup\$
    – billyzhao
    Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 6:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ You could try PTC reseable fuses :) \$\endgroup\$
    – olltsu
    Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 13:00
1
\$\begingroup\$

Could I interest you in building a bridge rectifier with Schottky diodes instead? Then polarity would be immaterial.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ A bridge rectifier with Schottky diodes would cause about more than 0.3V voltage drop, which may be worse than using mosfet, right? \$\endgroup\$
    – billyzhao
    Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 6:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ It would. I'm not quite clear which you prioritize higher - reverse voltage protection or minimum possible voltage loss. I like the idea of regulating voltage at the point of use, which would be after the bridge rectifier, in which case the bridge's voltage drop would be of no importance. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 21, 2014 at 11:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ Of course the protection would be ranked first. But I want to eliminate the effect of the voltage drop as well as possible. \$\endgroup\$
    – billyzhao
    Commented Aug 22, 2014 at 2:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ @billyzhao, You could always use a polarized connector so it could only possibly be plugged together a certain way. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 22, 2014 at 3:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeah,I have done it. But My circuit is for lab-use. Do you know the power source used in the student lab? I have to connect the wire to the power source output manually.It is easy to connect to the wrong output and reverse the power. However, thank you for your answer very much. \$\endgroup\$
    – billyzhao
    Commented Aug 22, 2014 at 10:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.