1
\$\begingroup\$

I have a transfer function, \$H(s) = \frac{-16(s+4)(s-1) }{ (s^2+16)(s+2)}\$. The impulse response is \$-16*(-3/10 * e^{-2t} + \frac{13}{10} cos(4t) + \frac{1}{10}sin(4t))u(t)\$. I am supposed to find an input of the form \$10e^{-at}\$, where \$a\$ is a positive number, so that the response does not have a term of the form \$Ke^{-at}\$. I believe \$a\$ is not necessarily the same number in the input and response. I am sure it is not a trick question. So far I have written out the transfer function \$\frac{(s+4)(s-1)}{(s^2+16)(s+2)(s+a)}\$. I don't think the constants are important for determining the value of \$a\$. My strategy is either the \$s+2\$ term would have to be eliminated or a conjugate \$-Ke^{-at}\$ would have to be added to the response to cancel them out. I have no ideas for eliminating the \$s+2\$ term. I tried to find a number that would make \$(s+2)(s+a)\$ into \$\frac{s}{(s+y)^2+w^2}+ X\frac{w}{(s+y)^2+w^2}\$ in the partial fraction expansion. I tried to use the Heaviside coverup but I didn't have any success. Any ideas on how to proceed would be appreciated.

\$\endgroup\$
0

3 Answers 3

1
\$\begingroup\$

Let \$\small a=4\$, i.e. use the TF's zero at \$\small s=4\$ to cancel the input signal's \$\frac{1}{s+4}\$ component.

This method of cancellation is not as successful as might first be thought. The danger is, developing a 'dipole' (not an antenna!), which is a pole and zero very close to each other on the s-plane. This is unavoidable since it's almost impossible, in practice, to obtain coincident pole and zero locations. The dipole, thus created, gives rise to a characteristic small amplitude, but persistent 'tail' to the transient response.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is the effect of so-called "blocking zero". \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 9, 2018 at 1:05
0
\$\begingroup\$

I would recommend starting with the output signal you have the Laplace domain: \$Y(s) = \frac{160(s+4)(s-1)}{(s^2+16)(s+2)(s+a)}\$.

Then decompose this single fraction into three (or four) partial fractions. One of those partial fractions will have denominator \$s+a\$. Its numerator (called its residue) will be a function of \$a\$. Set its residue to zero and try and solve for \$a\$.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

So I misunderstood the question. The alpha in the input and output are strictly the same and so an alpha of 4 will cause the denominator of the input to cancel with the s+4 term in the input.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.