The words are often mis-used. It's probably better to express exactly what's meant with equations, than to try to insist that everybody uses the words according to their dictionary definitions.
Lorentz Force is that force on a moving charged particle, due to the electric and magnetic fields in the region it's moving through.
$$ \boldsymbol{F = q(E + v\times B)}$$
However, a lot of people say Lorentz force, when they really mean the force due to just flowing current or motion of charged particles in the magnetic field, using only the \$ \boldsymbol{qv\times B}\$ term, which is more strictly called the Laplace Force, when it's had a trivial manipulation applied to it to turn qv and a length of conductor into a current.
If we talk about Electromagnetic Force, then we can mean any or all forces that arise from the interaction of charged particles, electric and magnetic fields (near fields), electromagnetic fields (far fields), electric charges and flowing currents, in any combination, according to our context.
The direction of the induced EMF in a motor is most simply given by Lenz's Law, which qualitatively says that the direction is such to oppose the motion that's causing the induction.
The magnitude and direction of the induced EMF in a motor is given by Faraday's Law of Induction.
These latter two 'laws' are included in, or are derivable from, Maxwell's equations. The have separate names due to how they were discovered, historically. We still keep these names today, mainly for their didactic simplicity. For instance, a grade school pupil can understand Lenz's Law quite easily, whereas they need to be more mature to handle the quantitative laws. I remember being quite young when introduced to 'the Law of Sheer-Cussedness', aka Lenz's Law.