2
\$\begingroup\$

First time using a PIC12F (I've used PIC16, PIC18, DSPIC24F, DSPIC30F and DSPIC33F in the past).

Made a very simple pcb (see sch below), but I'm having problems programming it with an ICD3. Didn't know, but these need a special header for debugging using ICD3 (don't have), but from what I understand it should be possible to program it without it (maybe not?).

When I try to debug, telling MPLAB that the header is there (but isn't), it detects the correct Device ID (1360), but complains that it is not what was expected (because it expects the header). But the point is that it COULD READ the Device ID.

But, when selecting the ICD3 as programmer (as opposed to Debugger), it reads 0's as Device ID, so it can't continue.

Any thoughts on why it is not reading the Device ID when in programming mode?

By the way, I don't use the stock RJ11 connector because it's too big, but I've used this smaller Molex successfully on tens of different custom pcbs with other Microchip microcontrollers.

enter image description here

UPDATE:

Not being able to read the Device ID is still a mystery, but it turns out that it can be ignored and the device will program just fine. The fact that the program can be verified and that it will read the device id with ICD3 as debugger makes me doubt the signal integrity hypothesis. I tried the 100 ohm resistor very close to the chip's ICSPDAT/PGD pin, and also a small cap right after (well, just a scope probe), without change in the results.

To really solve this I'll have to capture the PGD-PGC-VPP exchange and analyze it. If I do it I'll post the results here.

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

Your circuit looks fine. The 51.1 kΩ resistor and diode to Vdd on MCLR is a bit silly, but that's not getting in the way of the ICD reading the device ID. Two things to consider:

  1. Make sure that you are trying to use the ICD3 as a programmer, not a debugger when you are just trying to program firmware that should stand on its own.

  2. Maybe you are getting crosstalk between PGC and PGC? I usually put 100 Ω in series with the lines coming out from the PIC, followed by 47 pF or so to ground. That filters sharp edges the PIC can produce during readback, which can cross between the two lines. This is made worse by PGC and PGD being next to each other on the normal ICD cable. I often use a ribbon cable with a extra ground line between the two.

For more general demystification about PIC programming electrical considerations, see www.embedinc.com/picprg/icsp.htm.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think that is an 51kΩ 1% resistor. Could you tell why is that silly? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 19, 2012 at 17:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.