1
\$\begingroup\$

I always thought that capacitors (when used in phasor analysis) just had an impedance of $$1/jwc$$.

I understand that impedance $$Z=R+jX$$where R is resistance and X is reactance. Now, in one book I found that the reactance of a capacitor is $$1/wc$$. So the impedance for the capacitor would be $$j/wc$$.

How come it's j/wc here and we always used 1/jwc before??

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ 1/j = -j so 1/(jwc) = -j/(wc) \$\endgroup\$
    – John D
    Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 20:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeah but that has a minus sign. In the book it just has 1/wc as the reactance for a capacitor. So if I sub that into Z = R+jX. I get Z = j/wc not -j/wc \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 21:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ Well, maybe the book is referring to just the magnitude of the reactance since we know what the angle is for a pure capacitance. \$\endgroup\$
    – John D
    Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 21:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ Oh yeah, you could be right there. I'll take it then that in general X_C is - 1/wc \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 21:07
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @ElliotAlderson, if you're going to always express reactance as a positive number, you need to specify "capacitive reactance" or "inductive reactance"> \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 21:30

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

Some authors specify the reactance of basic circuit elements as an absolute value. Although this is confusing it is not so uncommon. The "trick" is to remember that if you define reactances as:

\[ X_L = \omega L \qquad X_C = \frac{1}{\omega C} \]

then the impedance for an inductor and a capacitor are:

\[ Z_L = j X_L = j \omega L
\qquad
Z_C = -j X_C = \frac{- j}{\omega C} = \frac {1}{j \omega C} \]

The problem with this approach is that you must always remember that the reactance as the imaginary part of a generic impedance (i.e. X = Im(z)) is not the same reactance you speak of when talking about "pure" capacitors (there the sign of the reactance is embedded in the value of X).

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.