4
\$\begingroup\$

I'm working on a fairly dense PCB at the moment and I'm having trouble fitting in all the component labels.

What is the minimum readable standard size for component designators on the silkscreen?

For example: What should the width and height be here?

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$

5 Answers 5

3
\$\begingroup\$

0.6mm high 0.2mm width lines is usable (a bit fat) in default stroke font.

You could try a bit smaller than 0.2mm width, 0.18 or 0.15mm (6 mils).

Best to work with your PCB vendor, not all can reliably reproduce such fine lines on the silk screen layer. In general, I've seen more problems with lines coming out too light and breaking up than being too heavy and becoming unreadable as a result.

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

On my own boards, even the most dense, I never go below 25 mil height by 5 mil stroke, and I even hate to go that small because it's practically unreadable. Generally speaking a "safe" designator size is 45 mil height by 10 mil stroke. There will most definitely be cases where this is much too large, so I would say use a size as big as you possibly can, but no smaller than 25 mil by 5 mil.

When arranging designators on dense boards I sometimes find it useful to group designators together slightly away from their respective components, and draw rectangles and lines to indicate which "group" of components they go with. I generally do this for diodes, resistors, and capacitors. Sometimes the lines may not even be necessary, especially if your components are in a unique shape which you can imitate with the silkscreen (see below).

enter image description here

There are a number of tricks that help make positioning designators easier, even when they are relatively large. Whether or not to include lines "grouping" the designators and components together is completely up to you as the designer. Just keep in mind that clarity is key. If you don't make it clear which designators go with which components, your board house will keep coming back and asking you for clarification.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't go smaller than 30mil, and try for 40 or 50 when space permits. Also, try not to place them with Vias in the middle of letters, that makes them hard to read also. \$\endgroup\$
    – CrossRoads
    Commented Jan 25, 2019 at 18:28
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @CrossRoads I agree regarding the 40 or 50 mil height. 25 has always been my absolute worst case, and I never use 25 by default. Regarding vias, sometimes I don't mind silkscreen over them as long as they're tented. Just be aware that sometimes the tenting can "cave", making the text less readable. It'll depend on your silkscreen size as well as your via drill size \$\endgroup\$
    – DerStrom8
    Commented Jan 25, 2019 at 19:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ Metric values (also since OP screenshot is in metric) would be "safe" size of 1.143 mm height with 0.254 mm stroke; minimum size of 0.635 mm height with 0.127 mm stroke. \$\endgroup\$
    – JYelton
    Commented Apr 7, 2022 at 17:52
0
\$\begingroup\$

I find the minimum readable size is 15mil height by 5mil width. You can go smaller then that but you may find it hard to read the board at that point.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Well, then just leave it off. Is there a specific reason you require it? Make sure you create a well-readable assembly plan and you should be good to go.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ With high density designs, a workaround I've used is selectively labeling important components, to help orient anyone looking at the board. This makes it easier for assemblers to orient themselves with the assembly diagram. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 24, 2019 at 22:02
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Fair, but the point of the question is to learn standard dimensions. \$\endgroup\$
    – tarabyte
    Commented Jan 25, 2019 at 1:46
0
\$\begingroup\$

On technical side, possibility to print small text is up to PCB manufacturer. You should consult with yours. Normally they should provide data on minimum line width and height of text. If only minimum line width is given, least reasonable height of digit and capital letter is 5x of line width (say, for "8" they should print 3 horizontal strokes and 2 gaps between, giving 5 line heights total).

On ergonomic side, consider human limits to read. First, there's least perceived size of letter. Per ISO 9355-2 it is 15 arcminutues. Second, there's least comportable read distance, which is about 40 cm. This gives least reasonable letter size of 40cm * (15/(60*180/pi)) = 1.75 mm. While most people can read below this limit, it is recommended to use magnifying devices with smaller letters. However in most modern designs text height is about 1 mm or even below, and magnifying glasses are widely used in manual PCB assembly.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.