1
\$\begingroup\$

I am confused regarding the analysis of the circuit on the left and its small-signal equivalent circuit on the right:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Here is my analysis:

Let \$i_1\$ and \$i_2\$ be the current through the parts above and below node \$y\$ respectively. Given that node \$x\$ is grounded, and assuming the reference \$V_{\text{ref}}\$ is at ground potential, we have:

$$i_1 = g_m \cdot \frac{r_d}{2R_D + r_d} \cdot V_1$$ $$i_2 = g_m \cdot \frac{2R_D}{2R_D + r_d} \cdot V_1$$ $$V_y = i_2r_d = g_m \cdot \frac{2R_Dr_d}{2R_D + r_d} \cdot V_1$$

However, \$V_y\$ is given as:

$$V_y = g_m \cdot \frac{R_Dr_d}{R_D + r_d} \cdot V_1$$

Where did I go wrong?

For clarity, \$i_1\$ is the current through the left \$R_D\$ and \$i_2\$ is the current through the left \$r_d\$.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Try to view the whole circuit as a series connection of a common drain and a common gate stage. \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Commented Jul 17, 2022 at 19:00

1 Answer 1

3
\$\begingroup\$

Just because the gate of T2 is grounded doesn't mean that the drain is (AC) ground. Basically, as T1's current changes (from \$V_1\$), since T1 and T2 are coupled via their sources, T2's current also changes.

If \$R_s >> r_d\$, then the total current is constant, so the signal at \$x\$ is the inverse of the signal at \$y\$ (\$x == -y\$).

Your small signal circuit is not correct either. \$V_1g_m\$ is not from ground, but is across \$r_d\$.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.