1
\$\begingroup\$

I designed a circuit for a high current linear regulator (20A peak, 16.4V (max) input regulated to 13.8V) using a Micrel MIC5158 together with a BUK9575-55A. The 20 A peaks are short, since the use is for a radio with non-continuous transmission.

I used the reference design, only with the addition of a Zener to protect the MOSFET gate (10 V max in my case).

It is not clear to me how to calculate from the datasheets whether it's possible to use multiple MOSFETs and how many of them can be safely connected to the IC. In the datasheet I also cannot find any information about the choice of the MOSFET(s), the text refers to the MOSFET always using the singular. Is a single MOSFET with big capacitance the same as multiple ones with a smaller one? what is the acceptable capacitance? and so on.

For better heat dissipation or for higher currents I may want to increase their number to two or three of the same model and batch.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ As it's linear, and the MOSFETs all have different characteristics, I'd say, one. Trying several, you'll find one conducts earlier and takes virtually all the load. You could probably design a controller for multiple MOSFETs but this one isn't it. \$\endgroup\$
    – user16324
    Commented Jan 9, 2018 at 11:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ @BrianDrummond I mean multiple MOSFETS of the same model and batch. Is your comment also assuming the same? \$\endgroup\$
    – FarO
    Commented Jan 9, 2018 at 11:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes it is. If you select them you MAY get lucky, but you'd have to satisfy yourself that temperature differences etc wouldn't cause their conductance to diverge. That's a more complex problem than I want to deal with in a comment - or even an answer. Andy's answer just popped up ... a good intro to the problem. \$\endgroup\$
    – user16324
    Commented Jan 9, 2018 at 11:22

1 Answer 1

9
\$\begingroup\$

I think you will need to rethink the idea somewhat if you are using the MOSFETs to limit current because, potentially, the load might be a short circuit and all the 16.4 volts would appear across the MOSFET. Firstly the BUK9575 safe operating area: -

enter image description here

I have positioned a red dot to indicate where 20 amps and 16.4 volts will be on the SOA graph and clearly, the device won't be rated to survive more than a few hundred micro seconds at this power.

So if you decided to use multiple parallel MOSFETs, the next problem is hot-spotting. Forget about what the basic text books say about MOSFETs sharing current - this does not happen in linear applications unless you are above a certain gate-source voltage called the ZTC voltage (zero temperature coefficient).

Now you may get lucky with this or you may not but, to withstand 20 amps and 16.4 volts for a decent period of time it looks to me like you will need 7 parallel MOSFETs each taking about 3 amps.

Then, with each MOSFET taking about 3 amps, the gate source voltage will be about 2.4 volts and you are in the "dangerous" area of MOSFET operattion - you are below the ZTC point and hot-spotting will occur. One MOSFET will start to draw more current than the others and its drain current will rise as per this graph: -

enter image description here

At 25 degC, with 2.4 volts gate-source, the current is 3 amps and warming the MOSFET. Current carries on increasing to 4 amps because of the "wrong" temperature coefficient when the gate voltage is below the ZTC point and, without much more time having passed, your junction temperature will be 175 degC and then it's the slippery slope to failure.

The device will start to hog all the current and burn. This is a well-known problem in eFuses, linear applications and current limiters. Try googling "MOSFET thermal instability" or "Spirito effect" named after Paulo Spirito.

Be also aware that not all MOSFET manufaturers show a complete picture of the safe operating area (SOA). Vishay (I have found) are poor at showing some of their MOSFETs SOAs correctly and they have admitted to me in the past that they are correcting their data sheets. MOSFETs designed explicity for switching loads are usually the biggest culprits so my advice is choose a MOSFET that is explicitly designed to avoid hot-spotting. IXYS make a good range I have found and, on page 1 of their data sheets they make it clear about the application that their "linear" MOSFETs are targetting.

A single MOSFET potentially suffers from thermal instability in the area shown below: -

enter image description here

And MOSFET manufacturers usually modify the SOA curves like this: -

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ Vds is only 16.4-13.8=2.6 V, not 16.4 V \$\endgroup\$
    – FarO
    Commented Jan 9, 2018 at 11:32
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @FarO this means you should be OK with 3 devices but it would be better to pick one device that could deal with the whole power to avoid any risk of hot-spotting. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Jan 9, 2018 at 11:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ Your answer seems complete enough, but maybe you could improve it with some lines in the beginning about my specific case, plus the original text following after a "in case that, instead of..., you have ..." \$\endgroup\$
    – FarO
    Commented Jan 9, 2018 at 12:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ FYI, negative tempco does not unconditionally lead to thermal runaway. Hot-spotting may occur, but as long as the hot spot is within ratings, and runaway does not occur, operation is still safe. NTC is a necessary, but not sufficient condition. Critically, thermal conductivity of the die and mounting base also play a role -- which is never documented, therefore we cannot infer stability curves from datasheet information alone. Only the SOA curve, if given, determines safe operation. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 30 at 10:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.